Citation and Use
All persons are granted a limited license to use and distribute this transcript, subject to the following conditions: No fee may be charged for use or distribution.
Publications and research reports based on this transcription must cite it appropriately. The citation should include the following:
We request that users send us a copy of any publications, research reports, or educational material making use of the data or documentation. Printed matter should be sent to:
Joel Samaha
Department of History
University of Minnesota
614 Social Sciences
267 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
Send all electronic material to samaha@umn.edu
Cover Sheet
STENOGRAPHIC TRANSCIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
Before the
MILITARY COMMISSION TO TRY PERSONS
CHARGED WITH
OFFENSES AGAINST THE LAW OF WAR AND THE
ARTICLES OF WAR
________________
Washington, D. C.
Session
X
Pages
1593 to 1815
1627
CONTENTS
Name of Witness |
Direct |
Cross |
Redirect |
Recross |
|
1632 |
1673 |
|
|
James A. Lynch |
1691 |
|
|
|
Millard E. Shaeffer |
1693 |
|
|
|
Frank P. Meech |
1697 |
1698 |
1698 |
|
Charles H. Stanley |
1699 |
|
|
|
L. O. Prior |
|
1702 |
|
|
Thomas J. Donegan |
1704 |
1705 |
|
|
W. Willis Fisher |
1706 |
|
|
|
Elmer F. Emrich |
1717 |
1751 |
|
|
Charles H. Stanley |
1755 |
|
|
|
H. S. Foster |
|
1758 |
|
|
John J. Gleason, Jr. |
1764, 1773 |
|
|
|
B. D. Rice |
1770 |
1807 |
|
|
Charles H. Stanley |
1810 |
|
|
|
John G. Willis |
1812 |
|
|
|
1628
EXHIBITS
Prosecution |
For
Identification |
In
Evidence |
Read
in Record |
81 Secret writing on handkerchief |
|
|
1690 |
217 Statement of Haupt |
|
|
1633 |
218 Second statement of Haupt |
1657 |
1657 |
1658 |
219,
219-A Coat and photograph |
1670 |
1672 |
|
220,
220-A Swimming trunks and photograph |
1670 |
1672 |
|
221,
221-A Satchel and photograph |
1690 |
1692 |
|
222,
223 Two shovels |
1702 |
|
|
222-A,
225-A, 226-A, 227-A Four German marine
caps, photographs |
1703 |
1704 |
|
228,
228-A Wallet and photograph |
1707 |
1712 |
|
229 Waiver of search, Nicholas |
1708 |
1708 |
1709 |
230 Waiver of custody, Neubauer |
1708 |
1708 |
|
231 Waiver of removal, Neubauer |
1708 |
1708 |
1710 |
232, 232-A, Selective Service registration
certification and photograph |
1712 |
1713 |
|
233, 233-A Social Security card and photograph |
1712 |
1714 |
|
234 Zipper bag |
1714 |
|
|
234-A Photograph of zipper bag |
1714 |
1716 |
|
234-B Photograph of slicker |
1714 |
1716 |
|
234-C Photograph of bathing trunks |
1714 |
1716 |
|
234-D Photograph of hand towel statement of |
1714 |
1716 |
|
235 Statement of |
1716 |
1720 |
1720 |
236 Second statement of Neubauer |
1733 |
1734 |
1734 |
237 Third statement of Neubauer |
1743 |
1745 |
1745 |
238,
239, 240 Waivers of search, custody
and removal, Thiel |
1759 |
1760 |
|
241,
241-A Wallet and photograph |
1760 |
1760 |
|
242,
242-A, Selective Service registration card and photograph |
1760 |
1762 |
|
243,
243-A Social Security card and photograph |
1760 |
1761 |
|
244 Hotel receipt |
1762 |
|
|
244-A Hotel receipt photograph |
1763 |
1763 |
1763 |
245 Statement of Thiel |
1765 |
1774 |
1774 |
246 Statement of Thiel |
1795 |
1796 |
1796 |
247 Photographs of boxes buried on beach at |
|
1804 |
|
248 Photograph, detonators |
|
1806 |
|
249 “ “ |
|
1806 |
1804 |
250 “ pen and pencil set |
|
1806 |
1804 |
251 “ timing device |
|
1806 |
1804 |
252 “ shovels |
|
1807 |
1804 |
253 “ fuses |
1807 |
1807 |
1804 |
254 “ cap |
|
1807 |
1806 |
255 “ timing device |
|
1807 |
1806 |
--oo0oo--
1629
STENOGRAPHIC TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDIGS
Before the
MILITARY COMMISSION TO TRY PERSONS
CHARGED WITH
OFFENSES AGAINST THE LAW OF WAR AND THE
ARTICLES OF WAR
________________
Washington, D. C.
The Military Commission appointed by
the President by order dated July 2, 1942, met, in room 5235 Department of
Justice, at 10 o’clock a. m., to try for offenses against the Law of War and
Articles of War, the following persons: Ernest Peter Burger, George John Dasch,
Herbert Haupt, Heinrich Harm Heinck, Edward John Kerling, Hermann Neubauer,
Richard Quirin and Werner Thiel.
Present: Members of the Military Commission, as
follows:
Major General
Frank R. McCoy, President,
Major General
Walter S. Grant,
Major General
Blanton Winship,
Major General
Lorenzo D. Gasser,
Brigadier General
Guy V. Henry,
Brigadier General
John T. Lewis,
Brigadier General
John T. Kennedy.
As Trial Judge Advocates:
Honorable Francis
Biddle,
Attorney
General of the
Major
General Myron Cramer,
The
Judge Advocate General,
Colonel
F. Granville Munson,
Colonel
Erwin M. Treusch,
Major
William T. Thurman,
Officers
of the Judge Advocate General’s Department.
Oscar Cox,
Assistant
Solicitor General of the
As Provost
Marshal:
Brigadier
General Albert L. Cox.
1630
As Counsel for the
Accused except George John Dasch:
Colonel
Cassius M. Dowell,
Colonel
Kenneth Royall,
Captain
William G. Hummell.
As Counsel for the
Accused George John Dasch:
Colonel Carl L. Ristine.
- - - - -
PROCEEDINGS
The President. The Commission is open.
Colonel Munson. May it please the Commission: The eight accused are present. The staff of the prosecution, except Colonel Weir and Mr. Rowe, is present. The staff of the defense except Major Stone, who is temporarily absent, is present. The reporter is present.
There are four new members of the guard commissioned and
noncommissioned, to be
sworn.
The President. They may be sworn.
Colonel Munson. The Commission requires an oath of secrecy
from all those who are in the courtroom.
That oath extends to the proceedings that occur here and to any
conversations about the proceedings outside the courtroom. The Commission instructs me to inform you
that a violation of this oath will result in contempt proceedings or other
proceedings of a criminal nature. In
taking that oath you realize that you subject yourselves to such penalties?
First Lieutenant
Joseph H. Story. Yes.
Second Lieutenant
Gerald R. Enos. Yes.
Sergeant Charles A. Russ.
Yes.
Corporal George C.
Beneze. Yes.
1631
Colonel Munson. Does each of you solemnly sear that you will
not divulge the proceedings taken in this trial to anyone outside the courtroom
until released from your obligation by proper authority or required so to do by
such proper authority, so help you God?
First Lieutenant
Story. I do.
Second Lieutenant
Enos. I do.
Sergeant Russ. I do.
Corporal Beneze. I do.
Colonel Munson. Those who took the oath were: First Lieutenant Joseph H. Story, Second
Lieutenant Gerald R. Enos, Sergeant Charles A. Russ, and Corporal George C.
Beneze.
Colonel Royall. May it please the Commission: Before the
taking of testimony is resumed or later, whichever the Commission thinks more
appropriate, the defense counsel wish to discuss further with the Commission
the matter of publicity and statements.
I have no choice about whether it should be done here or whether it
should be done in chambers with the Commission.
We would be inclined to follow, of course, whatever plan, as to that,
which the Commission should deem proper.
The Attorney General.
We might do it at recess. Do you
wish to do it before any evidence is taken?
Colonel Royall. I do not think that is necessary. I just wanted to advise the Commission that
we are ready and have prepared a proposed release which we want the Commission
to consider.
The Attorney
General. Perhaps it may be done at
recess.
The President. Do you wish to discuss it with us or just
1632
submit
it?
Colonel Royall. We should like to discuss it personally with
you.
The President. Then, if it is agreeable to both sides, we
shall be glad to have you discuss it as we did yesterday at the
Colonel Royall. That is all right.
The Attorney
General. Mr. Rice will resume the stand.
Lieutenant Page.
Mr. B. D. Rice. This
witness has been sworn to secrecy.
B.
the
witness on the stand at the time of adjournment on
Colonel Munson. Mr. Rice, in resuming the stand, you
understand that you are still under oath?
The Witness. Yes, sir.
The Attorney
General. The Commission asked yesterday
to see some of the money that was recovered.
These are fifty-dollar bills.
There are eight of them, one recovered from each defendant. I should like to hand them up for your
inspection now.
The President. Yes. You may proceed.
DIRECT EXAMINATION—RESUMED
Questions by the Attorney General:
Q Will you proceed, Mr. Rice? I think you had finished with page 7 when you
were reading yesterday.
A This portion of the statement is dated
at
1633
(The
reading of the statement of the defendant Haupt, Exhibit P-217, was resumed by
the witness as follows:)
“This job that I was promised was to
be at an unnamed place in
“In discussing the crippling of
railroad engines, while we were being trained, we were shown dynamite which had
been fashioned in the shape of a piece of coal and colored the same as coal,
which had a hollow place for the insertion of the detonating caps. These pieces of coal were designed to be
thrown into the coal car and when the coal was passed into the fire of the
engine, the heat would set off the detonating cap which would in turn explode
the dynamite and wreck the engine. We
were also told that by throwing sand or dirt into the hot boxes of the railroad
cars the bearings would be burned out.
In connection with the destroying of railroad equipment, we were also
shown how to place a charge under a railroad track, with a detonating cap in
such a position that when a train passed over it, the charge would be exploded
and the train would be derailed.
“We were also shown a canal lock one
day while it was raining, and it was explained to us that the
1634
proper
way to wreck one of these locks was to lower a charge by means of a string or
rope until the charge was near the lower hinge of the lock gate. This charge
was to be exploded by means of a fuse, which would transmit fire to the
detonating device.
“We were also shown how to use timing
devices for the setting off of explosives or fires and shown how to manufacture
timing devices from watches and by other methods, one of which necessitated the
use of pens in a bottle, which when dampened became swollen, setting off a
charge, and another way entailed the use of a tin can containing water with a
hole in the bottom, which set off a charge when the water leaked out.
“For a few days after May 15th,
we remained in
“Lieutenant Cappe gave each of us two
United States Draft Registration cards, one of which was blank and one to be
filled in by us when and where we saw fit, the other of which was filled out in
the
1635
fictitious names we were to assume
upon landing in the
“Counterfeit Social Security cards
were also furnished us, made out supposedly in a fictitious name. However, there seemed to have been a mistake
as mine was made out in my true name, Herbert Haupt, whereas I was to use the
name Larry Jordan.
“We were also told that we were to
attempt to develop contacts and assistants in the
“Just before we were ready to leave
for
“The understanding was that Kerling
and Dasch, the leaders, were responsible for distributions of the money in the
1636
our
expenses, and to pay necessary bribes or other payments necessary to carry out
our sabotage program. I was told that I
would draw $300.00 per month as living expenses, but it was understood that if
it did not cost me that much to live, the difference between my expenses and
$300.00 would be mine to save or spend as I wished. I was to obtain this $300.00 first from the
money belt that had been given to me and later from the leaders.
“In addition to Lieutenant Cappe,
there were nine of us in the party that left
“GROUP NO. 1
George Dasch
Ernest Peter Burger
Henry Kaynor
Richard Quintas
Jerome Swendsen
“GROUP NO. 2
Edward
Kerling
Herbert
Haupt
Hermann
Neubauer
Werner
Thiel
1637
“Upon our arrival in
“I have not seen any of these men
since Lieutenant Cappe took us on board a submarine in the harbor and talked
with the captain. I believe the
submarine was 584 and this captain’s name was Deeke. When the submarine lay in the harbor a sign
was hung on the conning tower depicting a sailing vessel. We took with us when we boarded the submarine
the sea bags and money, but had discovered in
1638
Cappe. He explained that he was not responsible for
the packing of the money.
“We left
“In the early morning of June 17th
the submarine approached the
1639
During our landing a deck gun had been
manned to cover possible trouble on the beach.
We walked north along the beach a short distance carrying the materials
about 300 feet back from the ocean. In
the sand we buried the boxes using shovels we had brought for that
purpose. We took bearings on the spot
where the material was buried, so that we would recognize it when we saw it
again. We then removed our swimming
trunks and put on civilian clothes, which we had brought in the zipper
bags. We then buried the shovels and the
army caps.
“The reason we had worn the army caps
was that the possibility of our capture as we landed had been considered, and
it was felt that if we were captured wearing army caps which were part of the
German army equipment, we would be considered German soldiers, and therefore
prisoners of war and not subject to the death penalty for entering the country
as spies.
“We then walked north along the beach
for some distance until we reached a point on the beach in front of a golf club
at Ponte Vedra. We stayed there until
about
1640
bus
schedule, and shortly thereafter a bus came along which all four of us boarded
to
“Werner Thiel and myself registered at
the Mayflower Hotel; Thiel registering as William Thomas, and I registered in
my right name. Neubauer and Kerling went
to another hotel, the George Washington, and registered there. I got a hair cut something to eat and went to
stores in
1641
to
go to Chicago and Thiel wanted to go to
1642
“The following morning, June 18th,
at 8 A. M., I took a train for
“It was near
1643
until
Froehling broke the news to her that I was home, and she rushed in to greet
me. In the presence of the Froehlings, I
began telling my mother the story of my experiences since leaving the United
States, which included my trip to Mexico City, Japan, thence to Germany, my
experiences in Germany, and finally my trip back to the United States by German
submarine. At first my mother did not
believe that I had been over to
“After remaining at the Froehling’s
home from approximately 4 P. M. to 7 P. M. on Friday, my mother finally reached
my father at home by telephone, and he immediately came over to the Froehling’s
home. He had no idea that I was there
until he actually saw me in their home.
“After my father arrived at the
Froehling’s home and we exchanged greetings, I again repeated the story about
my trip to
1644
in
“At the time we were all engaged in
this discussion I also told them that I had other money by did not mention the
sum. I also told Froehling at this time
that there were three other persons who landed with me in
“We remained at the Froehling’s house
until approximately
“After arriving home we were all very
tired and did not go into any great discussion concerning the details
1645
of
my travels. However, my mother and
father and the Froehlings knew that I was working for the German Government in
some capacity but they did not know actually what I was to do.
“On Saturday June 20, 1942, I remained
at home all day seeing no one or talking with no one until that evening. My father was at work all day but my mother
remained home with me. About 8 o’clock
Saturday night my mother called the mother of Wolfgang Wergin who lives at
1646
that
I was supposed to carry out some assignments in connection with the German
Government and that if I reported anything to the F.B.I. or government
officials in the
“Mr. and Mrs. Wergin were very much
upset over the possibility that something would happen to their son and
counseled me to register for the draft.
My mother and father also advised me to register for the draft. My mother and father thought that if I
registered for the draft I would be here legally and that there would be no
excuse for the FBI to question me concerning my Selective Service registration. I also thought it was a good idea to register
because I did not want to be picked up by the FBI in the event I was found back
in this country before the meeting to be held July 4, 1942, in Cincinnati,
Ohio, at the Gibson Hotel where all persons would meet who returned from
Germany in the two submarines.
“A girl boarder came home to the
Wergin’s place early Sunday morning about
1647
been
prearranged that I was going to sleep at their home Saturday night in order
that I might be there when the telephone call came in. This was nearly
“When I awoke about 10 or 11 a m the
next morning Grunow and Froehling were painting chairs. Around
1648
take
place at the Chicago Theatre which was to take place Wednesday, June 24th,
at 1 p m. He said he was going to
contact Frank Anlauf whose address I wrote on a card placing same in my
wallet. He said he was going to arrange
to leave his money with this man.
“When I left Neubauer I returned to
Froehlings place and later my father and mother had brought my suitcase
over. I had previously called the
Wergins and told them that I would be at Froehlings that evening, and they came
over. After they arrived we talked for a
short time about Wolfgang. Froehling
said that the people in the apartment above him were beginning to wonder about
the number of people staying with him and I decided to go home that night. I took my suitcase with me and went to
Wergin’s car. The Wergin’s remained at
our house until nearly
1649
“The following day
1650
start
work Thursday. Then we left and visited
Henry Koch, foreman of Simpson’s Optical Co. who is also a family friend. I told him I was going to start work there. I told him I had been in
“On
1651
taken
form the money belt prior to going to buy the car, and I had thrown the empty
money belt in the trash.
“When I took the money from the belt I
put some aside for the purchase of the car and kept some for spending money,
and the remainder, amounting to about $2500 I placed in an envelope and hid it
under the rug in my parent’s bedroom. I
later told my father about the money being under the rug.
“After I registered and obtained a
proper draft card I tore up the draft card given to me in
“On
1652
board. He was doubtful whether this was advisable.
He told me he was going to move away from the Sherman Hotel and he wanted to
find a hotel where there were negroes employed because he worked in hotels
before he left Chicago and many employees knew him; that he might move up to
the Sheridan Plaza, The Edgewater Beach or some Northside hotel. He did not say when. We arranged a meeting for 10 or
“After leaving Neubauer I called up
Gerda and she told me she had taken a blood test and wanted to know if I had
taken one in order to get our marriage license.
I told her I had but this was not true.
I told her I would call her again Saturday for a date. I then returned home for supper, after which
I went over to the
1653
I
went into the corner restaurant and saw him sitting there and spoke to him and
make a date for Friday night to meet him at the Blue Danube Tavern. I drove home; was unable to get into the
house and drove over to the
“On
1654
was
outside inquiring for him and when he came out he was very nervous and
apprehensive, but was relieved to see that it was me. When we went into Donath’s store Bill told me
he thought I was in Japan, but I lied to him and told him no, I had been in
Mexico and South America and had someone send the cablegram for me from
Japan. This conversation was in the
presence of Mr. and Mrs. Donath but Mrs. Wernecke had gone.
“With Bill Wernecke I then went to see
Dr. Otten on
1655
do,
and it stopped behind us. We started off
again and Bill drove up along side of this car and we observed that there were
two men in the front seat of the car.
The car turned off after this and we decided that no one was following
us.
“In Des Plains we called on Ernie
Scharff. The reason we called on Scharff
was because he was a mutual friend. He
is engaged in a cleaning and dyeing business.
He was not at home so we drove to a tavern and had some beer. We then returned to Scharff’s but they were
in bed and we only visited with them for a short time and returned to
Donath’s. After dropping Mrs. Wernecke
at her home Bill left in his car and Mr. Donath called me and told me to get
Bill’s outboard motor out of the house as its odor of gasoline was
offensive. He put the outboard motor in
my
“On the morning of
1656
a
member of the American First Committee.
He is supposed to be a traveling salesman. Reynolds came over and was surprised to see
me. We drove up to
“In the evening I went over to the
Blue Danube Tavern and met William Vallee who is an employee in the Scientific
Department of Simpson’s Optical Co. He
had two fellows with him, one of whom was named Hans and is an apprentice at
Simpson’s Optical Co. and the other man, whose name I do not know, is also an
employee at Simpson’s. We had dinner and
afterwards went to the Allerton Hotel where we went to the Tip Top Room and had
some drinks. From this place we went to
the
“The following morning shortly after I
left my home I was arrested by FBI agents.
“The foregoing statement consisting of
nineteen typewritten pages has been read by me and I have initialed each page
and willingly signed it, as it is true.”
The statement is signed by Herbert
Haupt and witnessed by B. D. Rice, Special Agent, F.B.I, and Earl Hirsh,
Special
1657
Agent, F.B.I.
The Attorney General. I would like to have this marked for
identification.
(The second statement of
Herbert Haupt was marked
Exhibit P-218 for identification.)
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q Mr.
Rice, I show you an exhibit marked P-218.
What is that?
A This
is a second statement that Special Agent Earl Hirsh and myself took from
Herbert Haupt.
Q When
did Haupt sign it?
A Haupt
signed the statement
Q Where?
A At
the
Q Did
he read it before signing it?
A Yes,
sir.
Q Did
he make any corrections?
A Yes,
sir, he did.
Q How
were they noted on the statement?
A They
were noted on the statement in ink and Haupt initialed the places next to the
corrections.
Q Did
he initial each page?
A Yes,
he did.
The Attorney General. I offer the exhibit in evidence and ask the
witness to read it.
Colonel Royall. No objection by the defendant Haupt. The same stipulation, of course, applies to
this.
(Exhibit P-218, previously marked
for identification, was thereupon
received in evidence.)
1658
Questions by the Attorney General:
Q Go ahead and read it.
A The statement is dated
Exhibit P-218
(The following statement of
the defendant Haupt, Exhibit P-218, was read by the witness:)
“I, Herbert Haupt, make the following voluntary
statement to Earl Hirsch and B. D. Rice, who have advised me that they are
Special Agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and that I do not have
to make this statement. This statement
is supplemental to a previous voluntary statement which I made at
“I would like to say that since making
the previous statement I have been shown a photograph of four men, and have
identified from this photograph the man known to me as Lieutenant Walter Cappe,
or Kappe.
“With respect to William Wernecke,
mentioned in the previous statement, I would like to clear up certain portions
of my activities with him. While talking
with Wernecke shortly after meeting him, he asked me if I had registered for
the draft, and I told him I had, but had not as yet received a
questionnaire. He said that I would
probably be drafted right away and ought to do something about it. He said he would take me to a doctor
1659
for
an examination, and that I should tell the doctor that I had coronary
thrombosis, rheumatic pains, swelling of my ankles, pain in my left upper arm,
dizzy spells now and then, headaches every week, indigestion, pains in my chest,
and pains in my back. According to Wernecke, no doctor in the world could tell
whether my heart was bad or not, because a bad heart doesn’t act up all the
time. He said that I would probably have
to be examined by a draft board doctor later on, but it would be a good idea to
go to another doctor first in order to establish that I had been receiving
treatment.
“We then went to see the doctor he had
in mind, who was Dr. F. B. Otten, at
1660
“He
gave me some pills to aid my digestion and to help me sleep, and I told him I
would be back after having the audiograph.
I told him that I wanted something to show them at work that I was not
in good condition, and he gave me a note dated June 25, 1942, on his
prescription paper, which has been shown me by the agents, which purports to
certify that his findings were such that he advised against undue physical
exertion for me, until a more definite diagnosis could be determined. I asked often if there would be any charge
for this examination, and he said No.
“After
leaving Dr. Otten’s, Wernecke told me about his own case. He said that he had obtained a draft
deferment for physical disability, conscientious objector, Bible student, or
minister. He said that he had feigned
deafness; he had succeeded in making the draft board believe he had coronary
thrombosis by being examined by telling the examiners he was stiff, and had
rheumatism fever. He said he had
contended that he was a conscientious objector and Bible student by reason of
his connection with an organization which, as best I recall, was the Christian
Mobilizers, and explained that very little was necessary to become a minister,
or Bible student, or student minister.
He said it was easy to start your own religion. This could be accomplished by having three or
four persons get together and start
1661
worshipping some object, and they could
then appoint their own ministers. It was
our plan for me to join his religion, which was the Christian Mobilizers, and
he gave me an application to join, which I left at home.
“He
said that he had taken three pills made up of one-one hundredth gram of
nitro-glycerin which would cause his heart to beat rapidly, and then had a
cardiograph examination during which he beat on his chest, causing the graph to
show a palpitation. He had then
submitted the results of these examinations, and statements as to his
disabilities and reasons for deferment, and sent them to his draft board. He was never bothered after that and received
a deferment, but was always worried.
“Before
going to a hospital for a cardiograph, Bill and I went to a drug store in the
Leap, where a male clerk waited on me, and I ordered six nitroglycerin pills,
one-one hundredth gram. However, the
clerk told me that these pills could not be bought in quantities of less than
one hundred, so I bought a bottle of one hundred, paying about thirty-nine
cents for same. We went to
“Returning
to the hospital I was afforded the examination, and while I was lying on the
table,
1662
Wernecke stood behind a deer and made
faces and motions to indicate to me that I should hold my breath and beat my
chest, and otherwise attempt to disturb the cardiograph. The nurse standing by however, prevented me
from doing this, but I was able to hold my breath. I was charged a five-dollar fee, and although
the hospital wanted to send the cardiograph to Dr. Otten, I made arrangements
to pick it up the following day and deliver it to Otten. My arrest prevented me from doing this.
“The
remainder of the pills I took home and left in the medicine cabinet. I was keeping these pills because Wernecke
told me I would probably be examined by a draft doctor and would need to take a
few more before this examination.
“Wernecke
also left me for a short time while I was with him in a bank. He went across the street to his “church”,
and upon his return told me that he had spoken to the head man about my case,
and the head man told him that the Administration was against God, but he was
for God, and he would help any man to stay out of the Army to keep from
fighting against God. For $100 this man
would register me as a Bible student dating back to 1941, and would ordain me
as an assistant minister. I did not get
a chance to talk to this man.
“Concerning
the disposition of the money given to me in
1663
arrival in the United States I had
approximately $3,500 in a money belt, $400 in my pocket, and a zipper bag which
contained an amount said by Kerling to be between $15,000 and $20,000, although
I never did actually see this money. After
arriving in
“On
the evening when I first went to the home of Mr. And Mrs. Otto Wergin, while
talked to Mrs. Wergin her conversation indicated that the Wergins were pressed
financially, and later in the evening, while in the kitchen with her, I gave
her a fifty-dollar bill from the money brought from Germany. I told her that this was a present from her
son Wolfgang, who had given the money to me for her. Of course Wolfgang had not given me this
money to give her, and there is no question that she believed me, because she
well knew that Wolfgang did not have fifty dollars to be sending her, and if he
did, it would not be in
1664
“Along
that line, there is no doubt that both Mr. And Mrs. Wergin knew that I had
brought money from Germany with me on his submarine, and that I was to act as a
German agent in the United States, because while I was talking with them when
visiting with my parents, Wergin said, in the presence of Mrs. Wergin and my
family, after hearing my story, "Don’t tell me, I know you're an
intelligence man." He said that he
had done something like that for
"We
had a discussion about the status of Wergin's son, Wolfgang, and I told them that
if I was caught in this country, that he might be picked up in
"Wergin
told me to watch out for a 'tail', and to stay away from his house, as he
didn't want me to be followed there, and that when the Wergins wanted to see
me, they would come over to my house.
"All
of our conversation at the Wergin home took place within earshot of Mrs.
Wergin, who occasionally left the room to mix drinks.
"Concerning
the money belt which had been given me in
1665
landing. When I reached Walter Froehling's home, I was
wearing the money belt and found it to be quite tight. While with Aunt Lucille and Uncle Walter
Froehling prior to the arrival of my parents, I could stand the pressure of the
money belt no longer as I had cut it too short, and it was pressing on my
stomach. I removed it and gave it to
Aunt Lucille, telling her that it was money and asked her to keep it for me in
a drawer, which she did. When I left
that evening with my parents I took the money belt with me and of course all of
them saw it at this time.
"My
aunt and uncle, of course, knew that I had just returned from
"While
at the Froehling home I showed the zipper bag with the false bottom containing
the money given me by Kerling to both the Froehlings and to my folks. My uncle took a good look at it and I told
him, 'Don't throw it away - there is money in there, and don't give it to
anybody no matter what they say or who asks for it.' I told him that there was a great amount of
money in there. I told them I had
brought the money with me from
1666
a phone call Sunday
"Concerning
Walter Froehling's brother, Otto, in Germany, I told them that he was running a
barbershop but told them nothing about his being in a concentration camp and
did not tell them that if they did not cooperate with me Uncle Otto would not
be released.
"When
I left the Froehling's that evening with my parents, Mrs. Froehling gave me my
money belt and I took it over to my home with me. The following day I opened it and threw it in
the trash. The money was removed from
this belt and placed in a brown enveloped which I found in one of the
drawers. I hid the money under the rug
in my parent's bedroom.
"I
told them I wanted to buy an automobile and wanted it taken in my father's name
so that in case anything happened to me the car would not be lost; that if, if
I was arrested he would still have the car.
At Warner Motors my father and I found a
"The
following afternoon I removed $400.00 from the brown envelope. Later my mother received a call from Warner
Motors stating that the down payment would be $60.00 more and $50.00 would have
to be taken in a note. I waited until my
father came home and then in their presence in the bedroom removed $50.00 more
from the brown envelope from under the rug under the bed. I then went with my father to
1667
Warner Motors where he made the down
payments and signed the note for $50.00.
The next day I withdrew enough money from the envelope to make up the
balance due on the car and gave it to my father, telling him to continue the
monthly installments.
"My
mother was worried about our using this money because she had heard about an
article in the newspaper where large bills were coming into the United States
from Fascist countries and there was a lookout for them, so she did not want me
to use this money and of her own initiative she withdrew $150.00 from the
family bank account and offered it to me to pay for the car. This $150.00 was mixed with the $450.00 down
payment because it was believed to be a good idea to have some money in the
payment which we were certain was good.
"Concerning
the purpose of my coming to the
1668
did nothing to correct this impression.
"The
Froehlings also knew that I was up to no good.
I told my father that my job over here was to hinder production. My mother said, 'You are here to do something
against the country and here we are earning our living here.'
"I
didn't tell Bill Wernecke about the true purpose of my being in this country
because I was afraid to trust him with this information. However, I told him that I had mentioned his
name to the German Consulate in
"While
at the home of Andreas Grunau with my parents, we talked with Grunau about the
war and he expressed the opinion that
1669
that
"In
talking about the job he had offered me at Simpson's, I asked him whether I
would be deferred and he said that I would.
"The
foregoing statement consisting of seven pages has been read by me, and I have
initialed each page and willingly signed it as it is true.
(Signed)
"Herbert Haupt
"Witnessed:
(Signed)
"B. D. Rice
"Special
Agent, Federal Bureau
of Investigation,
(Signed)
"Earl Hirsh
"Special
Agent, Federal Bureau
of Investigation,
1670
Questions
by the Attorney General:
Q You
did not take any other statements from the defendant Haupt, did you?
A No
other written statements.
Q Is
there anything which he said to you which bears on your direct examination
which is not covered by the statements, that you now recollect?
A Yes. He told me about
the money and clothing that he left at his father's home.
Q That
is covered by the statement, is it not?
A Yes, sir.
Q Anything
additional?
A I
do not think so, sir.
Q I
show you certain articles of clothing which I have had marked for
identification.
(A
coat was marked P-219 for
identification. A photograph
of
coat marked P-219-A for
identification. Swimming
trunks
were marked P-220 for
identification. Photograph of
swimming trunks was marked
P-220-A
for identification.)
The President. I think we will take a recess at this time
for 15 minutes, and I will ask the defense counsel and the Attorney General to
come into the Commission's chambers.
(An informal recess was
taken, at the conclusion of which the following occurred:)
1671
The
President. The recess is over and the
Commission is open.
Colonel
Munson. The same personnel so that prior
to the recess is present, except that Colonel Weir and Major Thurman of the
prosecution staff and Major Stone of the defense staff have returned to the
courtroom.
The witness is
reminded he is still under oath.
Questions
by the Attorney General:
Q I show you this coat which has been
marked F-219. Can you identify it?
A Yes, sir.
Q Did you show it to Haupt?
A Yes, sir, I did.
Q What did he say about it?
A Haupt told me on June 23rd when I was talking to
him in Chicago - he gave me a list of the clothing he had bought in Jacksonville
and the clothing he had brought with him from Germany which was at his home at
2234 North Fremont Avenue in Chicago, and when the agents recovered the
property there it was again shown to him.
This time they showed him the coat and he said this was one he took with
him to
Q You mean bought in
A This orginally was obtained from Ernie
Scharff.
Q Where did he get it, in
A In
Q And
took it to
A And
took it to
Q And brought it back here?
1672
A That
is right.
Q This
is a photograph of the coat, P-219-A?
A Yes, sir.
Q I
show you P-220. What is this?
A Yes,
sir.
Q I
show you P-220. What is this?
A These
are the maroon bathing trunks that Haupt said he had taken from the
The Attorney General. I offer these two photographs, 219-A and
220-A, in evidence.
Colonel Royall. No objection.
(Photographs
of Haupt's coat
bathing
trunks were
thereupon
received in
evidence
and marked P-219-A
and
P-220-A, respectively.)
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q Did
you go to the Froehling house?
A Yes,
sir, I did.
Q What
occurred there?
A As
a result of talking to Haupt I went to his home with Special Agents P.V. Robe
and E.R. Fletcher and there found Walter Froehling, who accompanied us to his
home at
Q Did
you examine the zipper bag?
A I looked at the zipper bag.
He previously had told me it had a false bottom and I turned this bag
over to Special Agent Lynch.
Q Special
Agent who?
A J.A.
Lynch.
1673
Q Special
Agent Lynch?
A Yes.
Q You
did not go through the bag yourself?
A No, sir. It was empty
at the time.
Q Did
you find anything else that Haupt told you about, at Froehling's?
A At Froehling's house?
Q Yes.
A No,
sir, I did not.
Q What
did Haupt say to you about the articles found at the landing place?
A While talking to him about the landing he said after burying
the explosives he and Kerling also buried a short distance away from that place
the four German military caps that they had worn over and also the two German
trench shovels that they had used to dig the holes wherein they buried the
explosives.
The Attorney General. Cross-examine.
Colonel Royall. This cross-examination is on behalf of the
defendant Haupt.
CROSS-EXAMINATION
Questions by Colonel Royall:
Q Mr.
Rice, you have seen a number of these defendants, have you not?
A Yes,
sir.
Q All
of them, have you?
A Yes.
Q At
one time or another you have seen all of them, is that correct?
1674
A Yes.
Q The
defendant Haupt is by many years the youngest of the crowd, is that right?
A Yes,
sir. I don't know how many years he is
younger, but he is the youngest of the crowd.
Q He
is about 22 years old, is that correct?
A Yes,
sir. He was born in 1919.
Q Now,
I believe you said in addition to what is contained in the written statement
which has been put in evidence and read by you that there were also some other
conversations with Haupt, is that correct?
A Yes,
sir.
Q Haupt
told, did he not, that his reason for leaving
A Yes,
sir. He said also on July 1st
he was scheduled to register for the draft and he left on June 16th.
Q He
gave you the incident about his trouble with a girl?
A Yes,
sir.
Q And
he told you that when he left his intention was to go to
A That
is right.
Q I
am not certain, but were you present when Dasch made his statement?
A No,
sir.
Q You
were not?
A No, sir.
Q Were
you present when defendant Burger made his
1675
statement?
A I
was present during the questioning of Burger.
Q During
the questioning?
A Yes.
Q Haupt
told you that his parents never knew he went to
A I
do not quite get the question.
Q I
say, until he returned to
A Well, for a long time he contended that he did not tell them
that he had even been to Germany, that he had just been to Mexico, and later on
he of course told them where he had been, but part of that time they did not
know he had been to Germany.
Q In
other words, he consistently said that until his return from
A That
is right.
Q He
told you the circumstances of meeting some
A No, sir. He said he
met a fellow by the name of Hans Sass and that he had just about run out of
money at that time and Sass recommended he go to see the German Consulate or
the German Consul there for help, which he did.
Q Didn't
he tell him to go to the German Consul first about help to get to
A No, sir. He said
originally when he got down there
1676
they
were not aware of the fact it was necessary to have a visa to go to
Q I
know it is difficult, Mr. Rice, to remember all these statements in every
detail, but didn't he originally go to Von Wallenburg to assist him in getting
a visa to go to
A He
did not tell me that.
Q It
was suggested he go to Von Wallenburg so he could go to
A No,
sir. He said he went to the German
Consulate and he and Wergin told the Consulate they were German boys and needed
help.
Q At
any event he did tell you he found it impossible to get to
A Yes, sir
Q And
that then he accepted assistance from the Germans and decided to go to
A He said that offered him a ticket if he would contract to pay
back the money that was loaned him, later on
Q That
is, a ticket to go to
A He
said the German Consulate assumed he wanted to go back to
Q And
he went to take a job in
A Yes.
1677
Q And
he told you that he cabled his parents from
A Yes, sir.
Q And
that he had cabled them from
A I don't remember anything about his having cabled from
Q He
wrote to them in one place, didn't he?
A He wrote to them from
Q Now,
he also told you that when he got to
A He
said that his citizenship was not quite established, due to the fact that he
believed he was an American citizen because of derivation from his father, who
was a naturalized citizen, in that he had never made any affirmative act or
sworn allegiance to this country and therefore it was possible he was a German
citizen, and there was some question in the minds of the German officials who
questioned him as to whether or not he was a German citizen.
Q He
did tell you he was watched pretty closely by the Gestapo and other agencies,
did he not?
A Yes, he did.
Q And
he found it impossible to get work in
A No,
he did not say that. He was unable to
get work because he could not get a work permit.
1678
Q But
was not that work permit related to the citizenship situation; didn't he tell
you that?
A No, sir, he didn't say that.
Q Did
you get information that he was regarded with suspicion and watched closely by
the other members of this group at school because they thought he might be an
American?
A No, sir.
Q Did
you ever discuss that feature of it with Burger, do you recall?
A Yes, sir. I did not
discuss whether or not he was regarded with suspicion but I discussed whether
or not he would be considered one who would carry out the purpose of his
venture and --
Q Now--
The Attorney General. I don't believe the witness has
finished. What did Burger say?
A Burger said he thought that Haupt was principally interested
in the monetary angle of the matter, that he would do anything for money, and
that was his first undertaking to do here, was to go to an optical company
where he had worked and explore the possibilities of sabotaging that place.
Questions by Colonel Royall:
Q Were
not you present when Burger said they were all instructed to watch Haupt
closely?
A No, sir.
Q You
were not there during all of his questioning, were you?
A No,
sir. I was not there during all of his
questioning.
1679
Q Did
he tell you he was asked to come to
A Yes,
sir.
Q And
did he tell you that they were holding his friend Wergin over there in some sort
of a camp or something?
A No,
sir. He said his friend Wergin was
working as a baggage man in a railroad station, either Koenigsburg or
Q He
said they would hold him responsible in some way if he did not live up to his
obligation?
A He
said it was not clear, but he understood that Wergin would possibly get in
trouble if he reported the matter after his arrival here.
Q He
did tell you the name of Froehling, his uncle, was brought up by Kappe, who
knew his address and name, didn’t he?
A Yes, he did.
Q And
is it not a fact that Haupt used his own name even when he landed at
A He
said he did.
Q He
told you that he had instructions, definite instructions, not to use his own
name but to use the name of Larry Jordan or Lawrence
A No,
sir, he did not. He said it was proposed
he use the name of Larry Jordan, but he felt he could arrange to use his own
name and in that way tell his own story of having returned from
1680
Q He
did tell you that it was suggested by the organization in
A He said he was given a Selective Service registration card in
that name, but was also given a Social Security Card in his correct name,
Herbert Haupt.
Q Answer
my question as to whether he registered in
A I
cannot sat that of my own knowledge. He
told me he did.
Q You
did not check it?
A No,
sir.
Q You
don't know whether any agent did?
A I cannot say.
Q Now,
he told you he was not supposed to go home to his parents until he had
accomplished his mission, didn't he?
A No, sir.
Q He
did not tell you that?
A No,
sir.
Q Did
he tell you he was not supposed to see Gerda or any of his old
acquaintances?
A No,
sir, he did not.
1681
Q In
some of these matters about which I questioned you, was there some period when
Mr. Hirsh was present and you were not in talking with Haupt?
A That I can't say. I
can't very well answer for Hirsh.
Q I
thought maybe you were all together during the entire time or there were
occasions when you left Haupt alone with Hirsh.
A Oh,
there were occasions when one of us would be present.
Q Did
he tell you that he intended to expose this plan?
A Yes, he did.
Q Did
he tell you that he knew if he did no expose it, Burger would turn them all in
anyhow?
A No,
sir. He said after he was arrested, when
asked how he thought he came to be arrested - he said he thought that Burger
had possible turned the other men in.
Q He
knew of Burger's experience in the concentration camp?
A Yes, he did.
Q That
gave rise to that feeling; is that what he said?
A He
said he had no direct conversation with Burger on that subject, but he had
gathered that Burger wasn't entirely in accord with the mission.
Q I
believe he told you that Burger told him that he hated the Gestapo worse than
he hated anything else in the world, or something to that effect?
A No, sir, he didn't say anything.
1682
Q Didn't
he say that he expressed hostility to the Gestapo?
A No. As I say, he had
no conversation with Burger on the subject.
Q But
he did say, though, that he intended, as soon as he could get the group
together, to abandon the plan and let everybody turn in? Or was he going to turn them in? Which did he say?
A To
whom were you referring, sir?
Q To
Haupt.
A Yes,
Haupt said it was his intention to turn the group in on the 4th of
July at
Q He
told you, did he, that he knew the F.B.I. had been following him the night
before he was arrested?
A He said that he knew he was followed, but he didn't know who
was doing it. He was afraid that the
money that he had on him had become known and possibly he would be held up.
Q Did
he tell you as evidence of his intention not to go through with the plan that
although he knew he was followed, he made no effort to escape? Did he make a statement of that kind?
A No,
sir, I don't recall any statement like that.
Colonel Royall. That is all I care to ask.
Colonel Ristine. I have no questions.
The Attorney General. There are just a few questions I should like
to ask.
1683
REDIRECT EXAMINATION
Questions by the Attorney
General
Q Did
Haupt say to you whether or not Kappe had told him to get in touch with
Froehling in the
A Yes,
sir.
Q What
did he say?
A His instructions were to go to Froehling and to make
arrangements to use him as a mail drop and as a meeting place or where the
members of the group could get in touch with each other, and also to use a
place where he could leave the money.
Q When—what
day—did Haupt say to you that he intended to expose this plan?
A He said that on June 27.
Q How
long had he been under apprehension at that time?
A Well, he was arrested about nine o’clock in the morning, and
I first talked to him about four-thirty in the afternoon, and in the next hour
he told me about intending to expose the plan.
Q Was
that in answer to a question from you, or was it volunteered by Haupt?
A That
was volunteered.
Q Did
he say to you at what time the intention to expose the plan had first come into
his mind?
A I
don’t believe he did say when he formulated the plan.
Q Did
he say whether or not he had discussed this exposure with any other member of
either of the two groups?
1684
A He
definitely said that he had not discussed the exposure with any other member.
Q Did
he say whether he had discussed this plan to expose the project with any other
person since he had been in the
A Along
that line, the only thing that he said was that on the evening before his
arrest he had been with two employees of the Simpson Optical Company, the names
of whom he did not know, and that while drinking with them he told them—he told
one of them—that after a while he would be with the F.B.I., but he didn’t
indicate what he meant, and he didn’t know the man’s last name.
Q Do
you know whether or not that was before he went to register?
A That
was after he registered.
Q Did
he say to you when he thought he was being followed?
A He indicated that the first time he thought he was followed
was the night before his arrest.
Previously, when he had been in the car with Mrs. Donath and Wernecke
and Mrs. Wernecke, the two women had thought that they were followed and had
noted down the license number of the car.
Q Yes,
that has been testified to, I remember.
A But
he didn’t believe he was at that time.
Q I
think you testified that Haupt had said in his statement that his father had
purchased a car, did you not?
A Yes,
sir.
Q Did you testify whether or not Haupt said
to you what he was going to use the car for?
1685
A Yes,
sir. He said that he had previously
arranged with Kerling to obtain an automobile, a 1941 Plymouth, and they were
to meet in Chicago, and from there he was to drive Kerling and a girl that
Kerling already knew to Florida, where they would dig up the cache of
explosives, and the girl was then to take the explosives in her baggage on a
train to New York.
Q Who
was the girl, if he said?
A He
said that Kerling knew who the girl was but didn’t indicate to him the name of
the girl.
Q When
were they to go to
A They
were to go to
Q When
were they to go to
A They
were to go to
Q When
were they to go to
A After
going to
Q What
were they to do with the explosives in
A They
were then to carry out their program of sabotage.
Q Do
you mean that Haupt said this to you?
A Yes.
Q That
they were to carry out the program of sabotage after they took the explosives
to
A Yes,
sir.
Q Had
he communicated that plan to other members in his group with the exception of
Kerling, if he told you, of course?
A In
talking with Neubauer, Neubauer had indicated to him knowledge of the meeting
at the Knickerbocker Hotel on July 6.
1686
Q Of
the proposed meeting?
A Yes,
sir.
Q Which
never took place?
A No,
sir.
Q What
about the fourth member of the group?
Had Haupt’s intention been to communicate with the fourth member, Thiel?
A He
said—
Q (Interposing)
Who said?
A Haupt said that Werner Thiel was to come to Cincinnati for
the meeting there—the proposed meeting there—on July 4 and then would probably
come to Chicago, too, for the meeting on July 6. The entire group was supposed to meet at the
Knickerbocker on July 6.
Q Did
Haupt say to you whether his mother had advised him to take any course of
action in this matter?
A Yes,
he said that his mother was quite worried and that inasmuch as F.B.I. men had
been inquiring for him in his absence about a draft registration matter, she
believed it would be a good idea if he would register and obtain the proper
Selective Service card immediately, after he first talked with her. He did that.
Q Had
she given him any further advice?
A Yes,
she told him that he should get a job as soon as possible in
Q Was
that all she told him?
A In
the statement –
Q (Interposing)
You need not go over the statement. It
is all covered in the statement, is it?
1687
A Yes.
Q I
am referring now only to matters that are not covered in the statement. It is a little hard to remember some
details. Did the statement say whether or
not Haupt said to you that he was assigned a German Army number?
A No,
sir, he did not.
Q Do
you mean Haupt did not say anything about that to you?
A No. We discussed the possibility of his being a
soldier, and he said that he was given to understand that his status was
similar to that of a soldier, but he didn’t’ say anything about having a
number.
Q Did
he say anything about the pledge he took, except that which is already in the
statement?
A No,
sir, he didn’t.
The Attorney General. That is all.
RECROSS EXAMINATION
Questions by Colonel Royall:
Q Mr.
Rice, is this testimony you have given on redirect examination about the use of
the automobile to be found anywhere in either of these two statements?
A About
the proposed use of it?
Q Yes.
A I
don’t think so, sir—about the trip to
Q Why
did you not put that in the statement, if it is correct?
A Well, it certainly was not left out for any reason. Apparently that came up in conversation with
Haupt during the
1688
questioning
or possibly after the taking of the statement and was a related matter that was
not included in the statement.
Q When
did that happen? While you were writing
the statement or afterward?
A My recollection is that we discussed this matter thoroughly
while riding on the train from
Q When
did that happen? While you were writing
the statement of afterward?
A My
recollection is that we discussed this matter thoroughly while riding on the
train from Chicago to New York, at which time it was not possible to make
adequate preparation to dictate, and we merely discussed the plan and the
operation, in order to complete the statement when we arrived in New York.
Q When
was that trip to
A We
left
Q It
was before the statement of July 5, then, was it not?
A Yes,
sir.
Q It
was on the very day of the statement of June 28, was it not?
A Yes,
sir.
Q I
believe you have already testified that those statements embodied what had been
told you over a course of several days?
A Yes,
sir.
Q I will ask you again: Why did you not put
it in the statement, if it is correct?
A The
only reason I can ascribe to that is inadvertence. It certainly was not with any intention to leave
any pertinent portions out.
Colonel
Royall. All right, sir.
The
Attorney General. That is all.
The
President. Are there any questions by
the Commission?
1689
There
seem to be none. The witness is excused.
1690
The
Attorney General. I will call Agent
Lynch.
I will ask the reporter to mark these
articles for identification (handing to the reporter a satchel and a photograph
thereof).
(Satchel
was marked P-221 for
identification. Photograph of satchel
was
marked P-221-A for
identification.)
While we are waiting, may it please
the Commission, yesterday Mr. Cox offered a photograph marked P-81, and the
contents were not read on the record or spread in the record. So I desire to read it now. I refer to the secret writing on the
handkerchief. It is as follows
(reading): (P-81)
"Maria
de Conceico Lopez
Lisbea,
Rus D. Carlos Mascarenhas 52 r/e Dir
"Pas
Krepper c/a/ E. Frey
R.F.D.
"Erneat
Dasch
11 Pelham Rd, N. London
"F.D.P. (Franz Daniel
Pastorius)
"Maria de
Conceico Lopez
Lisbea, Rus D. Carlos
Mascarenhas 52 r/e Dir.
"2158 - 37 P. B 142"
Lieutenant
Page. This witness has not been sworn to
secrecy.
Colonel Munson. (Addressing Mr. Lynch) In addition to your oath as a witness, the
Commission requires that an oath of secrecy be taken of each witness, and
request me to inform each witness taking that oath that violation of it may
result in contempt proceedings or proceedings of criminal nature. In so taking the oath, you understand that to
be the fact?
1691
Mr. Lynch. Yes, sir.
Colonel Munson. Do you solemnly swear that you will not
divulge the proceedings taken at this trial to anyone outside of this court
room until released from your obligation by proper authority or required to do
so by such proper authority?
Mr. Lynch. I do.
Colonel Munson. You swear that the evidence that you shall
now give in the case on hearing will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing
but the truth, so help you God?
Mr. Lynch. I do.
JOHN A. LYNCH
was
called as a witness for the prosecution and testified as follows:
Colonel Munson. Will you state your name, residence or office
address, and occupation?
The Witness. My name is John A. Lynch. My office address is 1900
DIRECT EXAMINATION
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q I
show you P-221 and ask you if it is a bag that was turned over to you by--Who
turned it over to you?
A Special
Agent Rice.
Q Did
you examine it?
A Yes, sir.
Q What
did it contain?
A I
opened the bag and it contained $9,950 in fifty-dollar bills.
1692
Q Did
it have a false bottom?
A Yes,
sir.
Q Is
this (indicating) the false bottom?
A Yes, sir. The paper
goes underneath that.
The Attorney General. That is all.
I offer the photograph in evidence.
Colonel Royall. No objection and no questions.
(Photograph
of satchel
previously
marked for
identification
P-221-A was
received
in evidence.
The Attorney General. Does the Commission desire to ask the witness
any questions?
The President. No questions.
(The witness left the
stand.)
The Attorney General. I will call Mr. Shaeffer.
Lieutenant Page. This witness has not been sworn to
secrecy.
Colonel Munson (addressing Mr.
Shaeffer). In addition to the oath
usually required of a witness, the Commission requires that an oath as to the
secrecy of these proceedings be taken, and I have been directed to inform each
witness given that oath that violation of the same may result in contempt
proceedings or proceedings of a criminal nature. In taking the oath do you understand that?
Mr. Shaeffer. Yes, sir.
Colonel Munson. You solemnly swear that you will not divulge
the proceedings taken at this trial to anyone outside of this court room until
released from your obligation by proper authority or required to do so by such proper
authority?
Mr. Shaeffer. Yes, sir.
1693
Colonel Munson. You swear that the evidence you shall now
give in this case on hearing will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing
but the truth, so help you God?
Mr. Shaeffer. I do.
WILLARD E. SHAEFFER
was
called as a witness for the prosecution and testified as follows:
Colonel Munson. Will you please state your name, residence or
office address, and occupation?
The Witness. Willard E. Shaeffer, Special Agent, Bureau of
Investigation, 1900
DIRECT EXAMINATION
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q On
June 27, 1942, did you go to the house of Mr. and Mrs. Hans Haupt,
A Yes,
sir.
Q Did
you search the house?
A I
did.
Q What
did you find there?
A I
found the sum of $2,440 in fifty-dollar bills, and, with this money, a blank
certification of registration for the Selective Service.
Q Where
was the money?
A In
a brown envelope under the rug in the bedroom of Mrs. Haupt.
Q Was
the envelope sealed?
A No,
sir.
Q In
what room was it?
1694
A In
the bedroom.
Q Did
Mr. Haupt take you up and show it to you, or did you search for it?
A No;
Mr. Haupt and Mrs. Haupt executed a waiver of search.
Q And
you looked around the house?
A That
is correct.
The Attorney General. That is all.
Colonel Royall. No questions.
The President. Are there any questions by any member of the
Commission? (No response) There seems to be none.
(The witness left the
stand.)
The Attorney General. I will call Agent Meech.
The President. Will this witness take any length of time, as
far as you can foresee?
The Attorney General. Five minutes or less, sir.
The President. Then this will be the last witness for this
session.
The Attorney General (after a
pause). I am sorry, but the witness does
not seem to be available.
The President. We will then take the luncheon recess and
will not meet against at either 1:30 or 2 o'clock, to meet the wishes of the
counsel.
The Attorney General. I prefer 1:30.
The President. Very well.
We will resume at 1:30.
(Whereupon, at 12:30 o'clock p.m., a
recess was taken until 1:30 o'clock p.m.)
1695
AFTER RECESS
(The Commission reconvened at 1:30
o'clock p.m., upon the expiration of the recess.)
The President. The Commission is open.
Colonel Munson. The full personnel of the Commission and of
the staffs of the prosecution and the defense, the eight accused, and the
reporter are present.
The President. Before we proceed, I have a statement to make
regarding the Commission's suspended ruling on the continuing objections of the
defense counsel, in which he objects to the admission of statements contained
in the confessions and admissions of the various defendants as affecting the
other defendants.
The Commission rules that those
statements are admissible as affecting the other defendants. In view of this
decision, the counsel for the defense is at liberty to recall for
cross-examination any witnesses he may desire.
Colonel Royall. May it please the Commission. Possibly I have had a misunderstanding, but I
had thought that we were going to be given an opportunity to present our views
on that question at whatever time the Commission thought proper. With that in view, we have had a rather
thorough investigation made of the law on the question.
I do not want to do a vain thing, but
I should like to have an opportunity to present those views to the Commission
if it is in order. I had understood that
it was the purpose of the Commission to wait for further developments before
making a definite ruling. There have
been some of those developments.
1696
We have a number of cases we think are
in point, including some from the Supreme Court of the
Therefore, if the Commission would
permit me, I should like, on behalf of these defendants, to present our views
on that.
The President. Of course, we will hear your views.
The Attorney General. May we stop up to the bench and speak
privately for a moment?
The President. Certainly.
(The
Attorney General, Colonel Royall, and Colonel Ristine approached the bench and
conversed privately with the members of the Commission.)
The President. Upon request of both sides, as represented by
the Attorney General and Colonel Royall, the ruling of the Commission is
further suspended.
The Attorney General. Agent Meech.
Lieutenant Page. Mr. Frank F. Meech. This witness has not been sworn to secrecy.
Colonel Munson. I will inform the witness that there are two
oaths taken: the usual oath required of a witness and an oath as to secrecy in
these proceedings.
The oath as to secrecy, I am
instructed by the Commission to state, if violated will subject the offender to
punishment for contempt or other proceedings of a criminal nature. In taking that oath, you so understand that
to be the rule?
1697
Mr. Meech. I do.
Colonel Munson. Do you solemnly swear that you will not
divulge the proceedings taking in this trial to anyone outside the court room
until released from your obligation by proper authority or required to do so by
such proper authority?
Mr. Meech. I do.
Colonel Munson. Do you swear that the evidence you shall now
give in this case on hearing will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing
but the truth, so help you God?
Mr. Meech. I do.
FRANK F. MEECH
was
called as a witness for the prosecution and testified as follows:
Colonel Munson. Please state your name, office address, and
occupation.
The Witness. Frank F. Meech. I am a special agent of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation. My office address is 1900
DIRECT EXAMINATION
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q Mr.
Meech, on July 2, 1942, as a result of information received by you from Hans
Max Haupt, did you proceed to the house of Carl Eggert at
A I
did.
Q Did
you search the house?
A I
did.
Q What
did you find?
1698
A We
recovered $900 in fifty-dollar bills.
Q Where
were the bills?
A Do
you mean where they were located?
Q Where
did you find them?
A The
bills were found in a cabinet in the dining room of the home of Carl Eggert.
Q Was
Agent Fisher with you?
A That
is right.
The Attorney General. Cross-examine.
CROSS-EXAMINATION
Questions by Colonel Royall.
Q In
how many places was this money distributed around?
A Just
one.
Q That
is the only one you know about?
A That
is correct.
Q You
do not know in how many places Haupt's money had been distributed around, do
you?
A I
do not.
Colonel Royall. That is all, sir.
REDIRECT EXAMINATION
Questions by the Attorney
General.
Q Was
the money in an envelope?
A No,
it was not.
Q Was
it in any container?
A It
was in a small wooden box.
The Attorney General. That is all.
The President. Are there any questions by the Commission?
1699
There seem to be none. The witness is excused.
The Attorney General. Agent
Lieutenant Page. Mr. Charles H. Stanley. This witness has not been sworn to secrecy.
Colonel Munson. Yes, he has.
Mr. Stanley, you were sworn to secrecy
before, were you not?
Mr. Stanley. Yes, sir.
Colonel Munson. You are reminded that you are still under
oath.
Mr. Stanley. Yes, sir.
Colonel Munson. You have also taken the oath as a witness.
Mr. Stanley. Yes, sir.
CHARLES H. STANLEY
was
recalled as a witness for the prosecution and, having been previously duly
sworn, testified further as follows:
DIRECT EXAMINATION
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q Mr.
Stanley, on July 1, 1942, did you exhibit to the defendant Haupt certain
articles of clothing?
A Yes,
sir, I did.
Q You
have identified the defendant?
A Yes,
sir; over there (indicating).
Q What
articles of clothing? Will you come up
to the table and show the Commission what you showed him? First, this duffel bag?
A Yes,
sir.
1700
The Attorney General. That is marked as Exhibit P-24.
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q You
showed him that duffel bag?
A Yes,
I did.
Q What
did he say about this?
A He
said this was a duffel bag similar to the one they brought from
Q Exhibit
P-22 appears to be a marine cap. Did you
show him that?
A Yes,
I did.
Q What
did he say about that?
A He
said this was a cap similar to the ones issued to them in
Q What
had he done with it?
A He
doesn't recall. He didn't recall whether
it was buried there or if it was returned to the submarine.
Q Now,
these pants, Exhibit P-39. Did you show
him these?
A Yes,
sir.
Q What
did he say about them?
A He
said these pants were similar to the ones issued to him and his group in
Q And
the coat, Exhibit P-32?
1701
A Yes.
Q What
did he say about that?
A He
said this was a coat similar to the ones issued to him and his group in
The Attorney General. That is all.
Colonel Royall. No questions.
The President. Are there any questions by the
Commission? There seem to be none. The witness is excused.
The Attorney General. Agent Prior.
Lieutenant Page. Mr. L.O. Prior. The witness has not been sworn to secrecy.
Colonel Munson. Mr. Prior, in addition to the oath you take
as a witness, the Commission directs also the taking of an oath of
secrecy. I am directed by the Commission
to inform those who take this oath that violation of it may result in contempt
proceedings or other proceedings of a criminal nature. In taking that oath, you understand that to
be the fact?
Mr. Prior. Yes, sir.
Colonel Munson. Do you solemnly swear that you will not
divulge the proceedings taken in this trial to anyone outside the courtroom
until released from your obligation by proper authority or required to do so by
such proper authority, so help you God?
Mr. Prior. I do.
Colonel Munson. Do you swear that the evidence you shall give
in the case now on hearing shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but
the truth, so help you God?
Mr. Prior. I do.
1702
L.O. PRIOR
was
called as a witness for the prosecution and testified as follows;
Colonel Munson. Please state your name, office address, and
occupation.
Mr. Prior. My name is L.O. Prior. I am a special agent of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation from
DIRECT EXAMINATION
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q Mr.
Prior, as a result of directions from one of your superiors, did you proceed to
A I
am stationed in
Q Excuse
me; I had not heard that. What did you
do with references to the instructions that you received?
A I
proceeded to a point approximately four miles south of
(2
shovels were marked as
Exhibits
P-222 and P-223 for
identification.
Q I
show you Exhibits P-222 and P-223 and ask if you found these.
A I
found these two shovels.
Q Where
were they found?
A Approximately
30 feet north of the point where the explosives were found and about 2 feet
under the sand.
1703
The Attorney General. I will ask that these photographs of shovels
be marked.
(Photographs
of the shovels were
marked
as Exhibits P-222-A and
P-223-A for identification.)
(4
German marine caps were marked
as
Exhibits P-224, P-225, P-226, and
P-227 for identification.)
(Photographs
of the 4 German marine caps were
marked
as Exhibits P-224-A, P-225-A, P-226-A,
and P-227-A for identification.)
Questions
by the Attorney General:
Q I
show you Exhibits P-224, P-225, P-226, and P-227 and will ask you if you can
identify them.
A These
four German machine caps were found in the same hole as the shovels at a point
30 feet north of the hole where the explosives were uncovered.
Q Are
these photographs which I show you photographs of the objects which you have
already identified? The first is
P-227-A.
A Yes,
sir.
Q P-222-A? State what each is.
A Yes,
sir; a cap and a shovel.
Q P-223-A?
A Another
shovel, yes, sir.
Q P-224-A?
A Another
cap, yes, sir.
Q P-225-A?
A Another
cap.
Q P-226-A?
A A
hat, yes, sir. I found these.
The Attorney General. I offer these photographs in
1704
evidence
and ask that they be spread in the record.
(Photographs,
Exhibits P-222-A, P-223-A,
P-224-A,
P-225-A, P-226-A, and
P-227-A were offered in evidence.)
The Attorney General. That is all.
Colonel Royall. No questions.
The President. If there are no questions by the Commission,
the witness may be excused.
The Attorney General. Agent Donegan.
Lieutenant Page. Agent Donegan. That witness has been sworn to secrecy.
Colonel Munson. Mr. Donegan, you are reminded that you are
still under oath.
Mr. Donegan. Yes.
THOMAS J. DONEGAN
was
recalled as a witness for the prosecution and, having been previously duly
sworn, testified further as follows:
DIRECT EXAMINATION
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q Mr.
Donegan, Colonel Royall yesterday asked Agent Fellner the following question,
which I quote from page 1527 of the record:
“That was the time Kerling
stated that Agent Donegan in an effort
to obtain a statement from him had
struck him in the face?”
Did you ever strike Kerling?
A I
did not.
The Attorney General. Cross-examine.
1705
CROSS-EXAMINATION
Questions by Colonel Royall:
Q Well,
after he told you that you had struck him, you took him out in a private room
alone, didn't you?
A He
didn't tell me I struck him.
Q Well,
you knew he made the statement and took him into a private room alone, didn't
you?
A An
agent came into my office and told me that Kerling had made the remark that
somebody brushed his face, and I told the agent to have Kerling brought in; in
fact, I went back myself, accompanied by Agent Foster -- I went back into my
office and told Kerling that was a lie and asked him what it was based on.
Q You
are quite certain that Foster went back into the office with you when you spoke
with Kerling?
A Yes,
I am.
Q Did
you not talk alone with him at any time?
A No,
I didn’t.
Q In
connection with this matter?
A No,
I didn't.
Q Mr.
Donegan, are you the same agent who made the statement to Mr. Dasch about the
Presidential clemency?
A I
talked to Mr. Dasch on Saturday the 27th, and I testified as to my
conversation with Mr. Dasch.
Colonel Royall. That is all, sir; I do not care to ask
anything else.
The Attorney General. No other questions.
The President. Are there any questions by the Commission?
There
seem to be none. The witness is excused.
1706
The Attorney General. With the permission of the Commission, I
should like to have Agent Donegan stay in the room. He is in charge of certain exhibits. May he do so?
He has now testified, and we should like to have him stay.
The President. If there is no objection.
Colonel Royall. There is no objection until the prosecution
reaches the testimony relating to the defendant Thiel.
The Attorney General. Very good.
We will call Agent Fisher.
Lieutenant Page. This witness has been sworn to secrecy.
Colonel Munson. The witness is reminded that he is still
under oath.
Mr. Fisher. Yes, sir.
W. WILLIS FISHER
was
recalled as a witness for the prosecution and, having been previously duly
sworn, testified further as follows:
DIRECT EXAMINATION
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q Do
you know the defendant Neubauer?
A Yes,
sir, I do.
Q Can
you identify him?
A Yes,
sir. He is seated right here
(indicating).
Q Next
to counsel?
A That
is right, sir.
Q When
was he taken into custody?
A On
June 27, 1942, at bout 6:45 p.m.
Q Where?
A In
the Sheridan Plaza Hotel,
1707
Q Did
you and other agents take him into custody?
A Yes,
sir.
Q Who
were the other agents?
A Special
Agents N.C. Dixon, Earl Hirsh, and myself.
Q What
did you do with him?
A He
was immediately taken to the Federal Bureau of Investigation office at 1900
Q Did
you search him?
A Yes,
sir, I did.
Q What
did you find on him?
A I
found a wallet which contained $331.88 in
Q Do
you remember the denominations?
A Not
entirely. There were four $50 bills in
his effects, as I recall it.
The Attorney General. I will ask to have this wallet marked as an
exhibit; also, this photograph of it.
(Wallet
was marked as Exhibit
P-228
for identification.)
(Photograph
of wallet was marked as
Exhibit
P-228-A for identification.)
Colonel Royall. We object to this testimony in the absence of
some waiver of search.
The Attorney General. I know of no rule of law under which a man
cannot be searched and the evidence offered.
This witness did not take the waivers, but they will presently be introduced.
Colonel Royall. Will they be introduced?
The Attorney General. They will.
1708
Colonel Royall. Then, the objection on that ground is
withdrawn.
The Attorney General. We have them here.
Colonel Royall. If you say they will be introduced, that is
satisfactory.
The Attorney General. I will ask that these waivers for marked for
identification.
(3
waivers were marked as Exhibits
P-229,
P-230, and P-231 for
Identification.)
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q On
what day did you say you apprehended him?
A June
27, 1942.
Q I
show you three exhibits marked as P-229, P-230, and P-231, for identification
and ask you if you can state what they are.
A Yes,
sir. I have witnessed the waiver of
removal and the waiver of custody; and the waiver of search was, although not
signed by me as a witness, actually witnessed by me.
Q Who
signed those waivers?
A The
defendant Neubauer.
Q They
were witnessed?
A Yes,
sir.
The Attorney General. I offer these three waivers in evidence.
Colonel Royall. No objections.
(Exhibits
P-229, P-230, and P-231
were
offered in evidence.)
(Exhibits P-229, P-230, and
P-231 are as follows:)
1709
EXHIBIT P-229
"
"June
27, 1942
"I,
M. Nickolas, hereby authorize Frank Meech, W.W. Fisher, and Jim Berg, Special
Agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Department of
Justice, to conduct a complete search of my room located at Sheridan Plaza
Hotel,
"This
written permission is being given by me to the above named Special Agents
voluntarily and without threats or promises of any kind.
(SIGNED)
"H.
Nicholas
"WITNESSES:
"W.F. Emrich - FBI
"Earl Hirsh - FBI."
EXHIBIT P-230
"FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
"UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE
"
"June
27, 1942
"I,
Herman Neubauer do hereby consent to remain under the continuous physical
supervision of the Special Agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S.
Department of Justice, without immediate arraignment, and at such place as may
1710
be designated by the said Agents, while
information furnished or to be furnished by me regarding any violation of the
laws of the
"This
I regard solely as the step necessary for my protection during the progress of
this investigation and my consent to this arrangement is, therefore, freely
given by me without fear of threat or promise of reward. It is, however, not to be construed as an
admission of guilty on my part.
"The
foregoing having been read by me and having been to be a true and exact
representation of my voluntary decision in this matter, or my own free will I
herewith affix my signature in approval thereof.
"Hermann
Neubauer
"WITNESSES:
"E.P. Emrich
"Special Agent, F.B.I.
"
"B.N. Fisher
"Special Agent, F.B.I.
"
EXHIBIT P-231
"
"June
27, 1942
"I,
Hermann Neubauer, having been first dully informed by E. F. Emrich, Special
Agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation of the Department of Justice, that
I have the right not to be removed from the Judicial District in which I was
taken into custody without being first arraigned before a duly authorized
1711
judicial officer or magistrate and
except by virtue of a warrant of removal issued for that purpose, do hereby
waive my right to be arraigned before a duly authorized judicial officer or
magistrate and my right not to be removed from the said judicial district
except by virtue of a warrant of removal issued for that purpose, and do hereby
freely consent and agree that I may be forthwith removed by representation of
the Department of Justice in their discretion to any judicial district of the
United States, either for the purpose of questioning or for the purpose of
being held to answer any criminal charge.
"I
am executing this waiver and consent of my own free will, and without any
pressure, compulsion or coercion of any kind whatsoever.
"The
foregoing document was read to me before I signed it, and I fully understand
its meaning and purport.
"Hermann
Neubauer
"Witnesses:
"H.F. Enrich - F.B.I.
"W.W. Fisher
"Sp. Agt. F.B.I."
----------------------------------------
Questions by the Attorney
General
Q I
show you Exhibit P-228 for identification.
Did you take this from the defendant Neubauer?
A Yes,
sir, I did.
Q That
is the wallet you referred to a moment ago?
A Yes,
sir.
1712
Q This
is a photograph of it, Exhibit P-228-A?
A Yes,
sir.
The Attorney General. I offer the photograph in evidence.
(Exhibit
P-228-A, photograph of
wallet, was offered in evidence.)
Questions by the Attorney
General.
Q What
did you find in the wallet?
A Contained in the wallet was a Selective Service registration
certificate card dated October 16, 1940.
There was also in the billfold a social security card.
The Attorney General. I will ask that the registration certificate
and photograph of it be marked for identification; also the social security
card and the photograph of it.
(Selective
Service registration certificate
was marked as Exhibit p-232).
(Photograph
of Selective Service registration
certificate was marked as Exhibit
P-232-A.)
(Social
security card was marked as Exhibit
P-233 for identification.)
(Photograph
of Social Security card was
marked
as Exhibit P-233-A for identification.)
1713
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q I
show you P-232. Is that the registration
certificate?
A Yes,
sir; it is .
Q I
show you P-232-A. Is that a photograph
of it?
A Yes,
sir.
The Attorney General. I offer P-232-A in evidence.
(Photograph
of Neubauer's
Registration
Certificate,
previously
marked P-232-A for
identification, was received in evidence.)
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q I
notice the words "Henry Nicholas" on this Registration
Certificate. Did the defendant Neubauer
say anything about that?
A Yes,
sir. He stated he had signed this
particular Registration Certificate in the name of Henry Nicholas.
Q When
did he sign it? Did he say?
A He
didn't say; no. He said the card itself
was filled out by George Dasch; that the card had been given to him in
Lieutenant Kappe's office in
Q I
show you P-233. Is that the Social
Security card of which you have spoken?
A Yes,
sir; it is.
Q What
did the defendant say about it?
A He
stated that this also was a fraudulent card, that it had also been given to him
in Lieutenant Kappe's office in Berlin and that he had brought it over to this
country to be used in connection with sabotage activities.
Q And
is P-223-A which I now had you a photograph
1714
of
that card?
A Yes,
sir; it is.
The Attorney General. I offer it in evidence.
(Photograph
of Social Security card
previously
marked P-223-A for
identification was received in
evidence.)
The Attorney General. I will ask the reporter to mark this article
and these photographs for identification.
(Zipper
bag was marked P-234.
Photographs
handed the reporter
were
marked P-234-A, P-234-B,
P-234-C
and P-234-D.)
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q I
show you P-234. Do you recognize this?
A Yes,
sir.
Q What
is it?
A It
is a brown zipper bag in the room of Neubauer at the time of his arrest. In it at the time of his arrest were found a
green raincoat or slicker--
Q (Interposing) Is this (indicating) the slicker?
A Yes,
sir.
Q Did
you make a photograph of the slicker?
A No,
sir; I did not.
Q What
else?
A And
blue bathing suit trunks.
Q Will
you produce them?
A Yes,
sir (producing an article of clothing).
Q Are
these the trunks?
A Yes,
sir.
Q Is
this (indicating) a photograph of the trunks?
A Yes,
sir.
The Attorney General. I offer the photograph marked
1715
P-234-C.
(Photograph
of bathing trunks
previously
marked for identification
P-234-C
was received in evidence.)
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q What
else?
A A
hand towel.
Q I
show you P-234-D. Is that photograph of
it?
A Yes,
sir.
Q Anything
else?
A A
pair of shoes inside of the bag. At that
time they were on the floor in his room.
Q Is
this the pair of shoes that are in the bag here?
A Yes,
sir.
Q Is
this the pair of shoes that are in the bag here?
A Yes,
sir.
Q And
is this a photograph of the bag (indicating)?
A Yes,
sir.
Q And
this (indicating) of the slicker?
A Yes,
sir.
Q What
did the defendant say about these articles of clothing?
A I
noticed that those articles had sand adhering to them, and I asked him how
about the articles, and he stated that when he left the submarine off the coast
of Florida he was wearing the bathing trunks, and that in the slicker he had
certain personal effects of his; that when he finished dressing he placed the
bathing suit and the towel in the slicker and took them from there when he left
the beach.
Q Did
he say anything with respect to this bag?
A He
stated that the bag had been purchased in
1716
in
a department store since his arrival in the
The Attorney General. I offer these photographs, P-234-A to
P-234-D, inclusive.
(Photographs
previously marked for
identification
P-234-A, P-234-B, P-234-C
and P-234-D were received in evidence.)
The Attorney General. Cross examine.
Colonel Royall. No questions.
The President. There seem to be no questions. The witness is excused.
(The witness left the
stand.)
The Attorney General. I will call Mr. Emrich.
I will as the reporter to mark this
document for identification.
(Statement
of Hermann Neubauer
was marked P-235 for identification.)
Lieutenant Page. This witness has not been sworn to secrecy.
Colonel Munson (addressing Mr.
Emrich). The Commission requires, in
addition to the oath taken by witness, an oath to secrecy, and instructs me to
state that violation of the terms of that oath will subject the offender to
contempt proceedings or other proceedings of a criminal nature. In taking the oath you understand that to be
the fact?
Mr. Emrich. Yes, sir.
Colonel Munson. Do you solemnly swear that you will not
divulge the proceedings taken at this trial to anyone outside of this court
room until released from your obligation by proper authority or required so to
do by such proper authority?
Mr. Emrich. I do.
1717
Colonel Munson. You swear that the evidence you shall now
give in the case on hearing will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but
the truth, so help you God?
Mr. Emrich. I do.
ELMER F. EMRICH
was
called as a witness for the prosecution and testified as follow:
Colonel Hudson. Will you state, please, your name, office
address, and occupation?
The Witness. Elmer F. Emrich. I am a Special Agent with the Federal Bureau
of Investigation, assigned to the
DIRECT EXAMINATION
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q Do
you know the defendant Hermann Neubauer?
A Yes,
sir.
Q Can
you identify him?
A Yes,
sir; right there (indicating).
Q Sitting
next to counsel?
A That
is correct.
Q Were
you present when he was apprehended?
A Yes;
I was.
Q Did
you take his statement?
A Yes,
sir; I did.
Q Who
else was present?
A There
were present in the room Agents Fisher and, for a part of the time, Agent
Hirsh.
Q Was
Agent Fisher there throughout the period?
A He
was there throughout the period.
1718
Q Were
you there throughout the period?
A Yes,
sir; I was.
Q How
was the statement taken?
A First,
by general questioning and then thereafter it was dictated to a stenographer in
his presence.
Q Was
it handed to him when it was typed?
A That
is correct.
Q Did
he read it over?
A He
read and initialed each page and signed the last page.
Q Where
was the statement taken?
A The
first statement of June 28 was taken in the
Q I
am referring only to the statement of June 28.
A That
is correct. It was taken in the
Q When?
A On
June 28th.
Q How
long a period did it cover?
A A
portion of the interview was taken on the night previous, carrying over until
approximately 12:15. Then the remainder
of the statement was taken on the following Sunday afternoon, which was on the
28th.
Q I
show you P-235 and ask you if that is the statement to which you have been
referring.
A Yes,
sir; it is.
Q Was
that signed by Neubauer?
A Yes,
sir; it was.
Q Did
he read it over before signing it?
1719
A Yes,
sir.
Q Did
he sign each page?
A Yes,
sir; he signed each page.
Q Did
he make any corrections?
A I
do not believe there were any corrections made.
Q Will
you look at the statement and see whether he made any corrections?
A Yes. There was one correction made here
(indicating).
Q On
what page?
A On
page 6 of the statement, wherein a stenographic error had been made as to a
day. It was given as Friday, June 28,
rather than Sunday, June 28.
Q Was
that made twice on that page?
A It
was made once on that page.
Q By
whom was the correction made?
A This
printing is my printing.
Q You
mean, in the ink writing
A Yes,
sir. The word "Sunday" is my
handwriting; and Hermann Neubauer signed his name thereunder.
Q There
appears to be a further correction a little further down the page. What is that correction?
A That
correction is "
Q Who
made that correction?
A It
was apparently made by Agent Fisher.
Q Do
you remember who made it?
A No,
sir; I do not.
Colonel Royall. There is no question about it.
1720
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q Was
each page signed by Neubauer?
A Yes,
sir.
The Attorney General. I offer the statement marked P-235 in
evidence and request that the witness read it.
Colonel Royall. No objection by the defendant Neubauer. The same stipulation applies.
(Statement
of Hermann Neubauer
dated
June 28, 1942,
identification, was received in
evidence.)
(EXHIBIT P-235)
The Witness (reading):
"
June
28, 1942
"I,
Herman Otto Neubauer, make the following voluntary statement to Special Agents
K.F. Emrich and W.W. Fisher who have identified themselves to me as Special
Agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Department of
Justice. No threats or promises have
been made to me in scouring this statement.
"I
was born February 5, 1910, at
1721
"Around
Christmas of 1931 I was laid off. I
obtained work as a cook at the Neublien Hotel,
"While
I was employed on the S.S. Monterey in the fall of 1932, I filed my first
papers for
"Following
this, I as employed at the following places as a cook: Atlantic Hotel,
"I
then went to
1722
1939, making two trips to
"Upon
arriving in
"The
following October, Edward Kerling, Joseph Nussbaum, Ernest Metting, and Richard
Ernest Heinze and I purchased the yacht 'Lekalla' from Paul Schwarz of New York
City for the sum of about $1,500 or $1,800.
We purchased this yacht for the purpose of returning to Germany and all
of the men I have mentioned, together with a man named Capalette and Mrs. Maria
Kerling, went by bus to Baltimore, Maryland, where we boarded the 'Lekalla' and
left for the port of New York where we intended to drop Mrs. Kerling in New
York City, but we were stopped by the United States Coast Guard at a point off
of Atlantic City, New Jersey and were instructed to continue to go to the Coast
Guard Station at Staten Island, New York.
"When
we arrived we were questioned by agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation
and officers of the United States Coast Guard and Bureau of Immigration and
Custom officials searched the boat. We
were detained
1723
for three weeks and were told that we
would not be allowed to make a voyage to
"Kerling,
Nussbaum, Heinze, Metting, and I and two other men named August Kock and
Kroeger, who were German aliens and seamen formerly with the Standard Oil
Company of New Jersey, and who we asked to take us to Miami, left New York on
the yacht and after about a week's sailing, we were stopped by the United
States Coast Guard at Wrightsville, North Carolina, who detained us at
Wrightsville for about nine days. During
this time Kroeger and Kock left the yacht and said they were returning to
"I
got a job as a cook at the Dempsey-Vanderbilt Hotel in Miami Beach, Florida
were I worked from about ten to twelve days, after which I worked at the
Hoffbrau at Miami, Florida for about two months. During my employment at the Hoffbrau, my
girlfriend Alma Wolf,
1724
on
"In
July I left
"I
lived with them from August to November, during which time I was not
employed. In November, 1940, I was
drafted as a private into the Germany Army and assigned to the Infantry. I received military training until May of
1941 at
"I
was taken to the
1725
forehead above my right eye, and in the
calf of my left leg, which the doctors indicate they are unable to remove. I was then given six week's furlough due to
this disability which time I spent with my wife and parents at
"On
January 8, 1942, I reported back to the
"Several
days later, I was given a railroad ticket and written orders to report in three
days to a training school in
1726
“I
reported to the school in the middle part of April 1942 and I then learned than
Edward Kerling was also a member of the school.
At the school Kerling and I were grouped together with Herbert Haupt and
Bill Thomis whom I also knew as Thiel, and received instructions and schooling
together. I had never met Haupt or
Thomis until that time. The term of the
school lasted for a period of sixteen days and the hours we attended were
usually from 9 A.M. to 2 P.M. or 9 A.M. to 4 P.M. and we had recreational periods
in the mornings. Most of our discussions
and lectures were in English which was for the purpose of becoming familiar
with the English language and customs.
We were instructed in English and learned American songs. Our lectures were mostly about the use of
numerous explosives and their chemical makeup and the manner of setting them
off. We had no actual experience in
setting explosives. We were also
instructed in the use of secret writing.
We were also told how to commit certain acts of sabotage and in
particular were told about putting explosives on railroad tracks to cause
wrecks of freight trains so as to stop transportation of war material. We were specifically told never to wreck any
passenger trains because they didn’t want any persons killed. We lived in quarters on what appeared to be a
farm house and at various periods of the day my group was joined by another
group possibly one or two other students.
I cannot recall the name of the group but I have been shown pictures of
Ernest
1727
Berger, Heinrich Harm Heinck and
Richard Quirin whom I recognize as being members of the second group.
“When
school had been completed a man in civilian clothes whose name I did not know
spoke before the class in German and advised that we were being sent to the
1728
“The submarine immediately left and
after about three weeks the four of us landed at
“We
then walked along the beach for about an hour
1729
or a hour and a half and then went up
to the highway where we got a bus for
“On
Friday morning at 8.30 A.M. June 19th, 1942 we left
1730
went to a movie and afterwards had
dinner and then went to the railroad station to get a train for
“On
Monday or Tuesday night June 22nd or 23rd, 1942 I visited
the home of Harry Jaques and his wife Emma at
1731
This was the first time that I had ever
met Harry and Emma Jaques but I knew about them through their acquaintance with
my wife, and I recall that they sent us congratulations following our marriage,
and my wife has visited with Emma’s sister at Stuttgard, Germany during the
time I was in the hospital. When I
arrived at the apartment I first told them my name was Henry Nicholas, but I
later told them that I was actually Hermann Neubauer, Alma Neubauer’s husband,
and that seemed to surprise them and they were not immediately convinced that I
was Herman Neubauer until I had told them about my wife and their relatives in
Germany and showed them my wound scars which they had learned about through
letters from my wife. Although they no
doubt got the impression that I had received the money from
“On
Wednesday evening June 24th I left the LaSalle Hotel, Room 1813 and
checked in at the Sherman Hotel Room 683.
On Friday June 26th I checked in at the Sheridan Plaza
Hotel. On Friday night at approximately
ten p.m. I again visited the Jacques residence and I talked with them for two
hours. During the conversation we
discussed various things about
1732
States by submarine, but I still did
not tell them that I had come over on a submarine.
“Since
my arrival in the
“During
the rime I was previously in
“In
addition I recall that some time during July 1938 while I was living at
“I
admit that I came to the United States with this group for the purpose of
committing acts of sabotage and might have done so if the opportunity arose,
but in discussing with Herbert Haupt the matter in general while in Chicago
both of us talked about and felt that we would not have a bit of a chance to
commit
1733
any sabotage.
“I
have read the above statement consisting of this and six previous pages, and it
have been read to me, and the information in it is true to the best of my
knowledge.”
That is signed by Hermann Neubauer and
witnessed by myself and Agent W.W. Fisher.
The Attorney General. I would like to have this marked for
identification.
(The
second statement of Hermann
Neubauer
was marked Exhibit P-236
for
Identification.)
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q I
show you, marked for identification P-236, a document dated June 30, 1942. Is this the second statement that you took
from Neubauer?
A Yes,
sir.
Q You
took it on June 30th?
A Partially
on June 29th and partially on June 30th. He was questioned a part of the time on the
29th and the statement was actually transcribed on the 30th.
Q And
he signed this?
A He
signed it on the 30th.
Q He
signed each page?
A He
signed each page in this statement, and he also affixed his signature at the
end.
Q And
you witnessed it?
A That
is correct.
Q And
he made some corrections on it before he signed
1734
it?
A I
believe there is one correction on this, on page 2, which is--
Q Never
mind what it is. There is a correction
on page 2?
A Yes,
that is right.
Q And
he initiated the correction?
A Yes. There is also a correction on page 3, and he
initiated that. There is a correction on
page 4 and that is initiated by Neubauer.
The Attorney General. I offer P-236 in evidence.
Colonel Royall. No objection on the part of defendant
Neubauer. The same Stipulation.
The Attorney General. Will you read it please, Mr. Witness.
(Exhibit
P-236, previously marked
for
identification was thereupon
received
in evidence and is as
follows:)
EXHIBIT P-236
The Witness (reading):
“I,
Hermann Otto Neubauer, make the following supplemental statement to Special
Agents W.W. Fisher and E.F. Emrich, for the purpose of explaining in more
detail information previously given to the above agents by me in a statement on
June 28, 1942. No threats or promises
have been made to me in securing this statement and I have been advised that
same may be used in court.
“During
the early part of March, 1942, while I
1735
was at the Army Medical Center near
Vienna, Austria, I received a letter from a Mr. Cappe, who indicated himself as
being a Lieutenant in German Army. This
letter was typewritten and made inquiry as to whether I would be willing to go
on an assignment to a country where I had been for some time. The letter also requested that I give an immediate
reply. I thereupon answered this letter
advising that I would go on this assignment and addressed the letter to
Lieutenant Cappe in care of the Feldpost number, which was the usual means of
communicating with other members in the Armed Forces.
“About
three weeks later, I was called to the company office and given a railroad
ticket to Berlin, together with a slip of paper containing the address of an
apartment on Rackstrasse and at this time was told to go to my home in Hamburg,
Germany and obtain my civilian clothes and report directly to the apartment
building, the address of which has been given.
On the Wednesday before Easter, I left
1736
1940.
There were also in the apartment at this time another group of four men
whose last names I do not recall but who I remember as ‘Pete’, ‘Dick’,
‘Heinrich’ and ‘George.’ I have been shown numerous photographs and can
identify the picture of Ernest Burger as ‘Pete’, the picture of Richard Quirin
as ‘Dick’, the picture of Heinck as ‘Heinrich’ and the picture of George Dasch
as ‘George’. Another member of the group
gathered there was a man who I remember as ‘Scotty’, but who did not complete
the training. This man as best I can
recall was small of stature, reddish complexion, reddish or copper colored hair
and with a freckled face.
“When
the entire group had gathered, the man who I know as Lieutenant Cappe talked to
us and advised that we were going through a training school where we could
study the use of various types of explosives, how to use various chemical
compounds, the knowledge of which we were to use in connection with a
confidential assignment in a foreign country.
I do not believe that any mention was made at that time of the fact that
we were to be sent to the
“Thereafter,
and on the same day, we all went to the railroad station in
1737
directed us by street car and bus to a
house in the country where the school was to be geld. Upon arrival at the school we were shown our
rooms by the superintendent of the building.
For the next two day we did nothing other than to have recreation and
sports. On the third day we met for the
first time the instructors, who, as I recall were Doctors Schultz and Koenig. At this time, Lieutenant Cappe, who had also
appeared at the school advised us that a schedule would be placed on the
bulletin board indicating the time when we were to attend classes starting on
the following day at 9:00 A.M.
“With
regard to the actual training, we spent a period each morning engaging in
sports and recreation. At 9:00 A.M. each
morning we attended a class where we were instructed how to mix explosive
compounds and how to fuses and timing devices in connection with the
explosives. This class would usually
take until lunch period and immediately after lunch we would have a recreation
period until about 2:00 o’clock. After
2:00 o’clock we would go to another class room where we would experiment in the
mixing of explosives and use of these explosives which were taught us in the
morning.
“In
one of our morning courses, we were taught how to mix and to use secret
writing. At other times during our
training period, we would get together with Lieutenant Cappe and discuss actual
possibilities of sabotage and cases of sabotage. I recall particularly
1738
that mention was made as to the
sabotaging of aluminum plants as a method of cutting down the production of
airplanes. Also, the sabotaging of
railroad tracks to hamper or cut down the movement of freight within the country,
he pointing out that German submarines were already taking their part in
cutting down the movement of freight from one country to another. As an example of hampering the traffic of
freight within the States, it was explained that sabotage on the Hell Gate
Bridge in New York City would cause considerable damage as a great deal of
traffic passed on the tracks of this bridge and it was specifically mentioned
that it would be almost impossible to sabotage the bridge itself and suggested
where the possibility existed the sabotage should be committed to the railroad
tracks themselves which would gain the desired effect.
“During
our course of training, we were each requested to submit in writing a longhand
statement containing a history of the character which we were to assume when we
reached the country in which we were to operate.
“The
course of our actual training lasted for two full weeks and in all I believe we
were at the school in Brandenberg for a period of about sixteen or seventeen
days and around the end of April or the first part of May our training was
completed and we were given a furlough for ten or twelve days, which I spend in
Berlin and Denzig with my wife.
1739
“Prior
to the time we had left the school we were instructed to report to the
apartment on Rankstrasse on or about May 12, 1942. When we gathered in that apartment on the
previous mentioned date, I, together with three members of my group and the
four members of the other group were present with Lieutenant Cappe. We sent the next three days in making a tour
around
“On
Thursday, we were first taken to canal locks and were advised that the most effective
way of sabotaging the locks in a canal would be by placing the explosives
(spreng mittel) near the hinges of the locks.
They also mentioned the possibility of hampering any traffic or use of
the canal by the sinking of a boat loaded with cement, this being carried out
by placing the explosives in the hold of the vessel and upon the explosion
would cause a hole to be ripped into the side of the boat permitting the water
to mix with the cement, and causing the boat to settle to the bottom.
“On
the next day, we were taken to a railroad yard where we were told that the
signals, switches and controls were the most vital points there but we were
told that most likely we would be unable to reach them with explosives but that
we would, by placing an explosive along the track, destroy the rail or cause
1740
the wrecking of the freight train. The instructor told us that we were not,
under any circumstances to damage the tracks or rails of any trains carrying
passengers as that would cause the killing citizens which they did not want.
“He
told us we could place sand in the grease boxes of the engine of freight cars.
“On
the next day, all of us were taken to an aluminum plant at which time certain
vital points of the plant were explained to us, such as the transformers and
generators in the power plants. We were
told that it would be extremely difficult for us to get inside of the plants in
the
“With
regard to the commission of actual sabotage, at the time we left Brandenberg on
the bus we passed by a small bridge and at the time Lieutenant Cappe pointed
out to us that it would take too large a quantity of explosives to blow up or
wreck even a small bridge of that type but if the chance ever occurred, the
greatest damage could be done to a bridge by placing the explosives near the
two big carriers in the middle of the bridge.
“The
following day, after we had completed our tours, we returned to the apartment
on Rankstrasses at which time we were given a personal interview by Lieutenant
Cappe during which interview he produced
1741
and requested that we read over and
sign two pieces of paper, the first of these being in the nature of a contract
written in German whereby the German Government, in consideration for my
agreeing to perform certain duties would deposit to my credit in a bank in
Berlin, Germany the sum of two hundred marks per month during the period I was
away from Germany on the assignment. It
was also agreed that the German Government would continue to pay my wife the
sum of two hundred and thirty-five marks per month, which sum she was at the
present time receiving due to my being a member of the German Army. In addition, that in the event I do not
return to
“At
the same time, I signed another paper which was in the nature of a pledge,
although the provisions thereof are somewhat vague in my mind at the present
time. However, it stated generally that
I was not to tell any of my relatives or anyone the nature or purpose of my
assignment. I am unable to state whether
this pledge contained any penalty.
“At
the time I signed this contract and pledge, Lieutenant Cappe told me that in
the even I were
1742
arrested in the
“I
wish to state that at no time either during the training school period or prior
to my departure from
“I
also wish to state that I made a trip to
“On
July 11, 1940 when I left
“My
transportation from
1743
“In
addition to joining the German-American Bund I became a member of the NSDAP at
“I
might state at the time I signed this application and it was accepted, it was
necessary for me to take an oath that I was a loyal member of the Nazi Party.
“The
above statement, numbering five pages has been read over by me and is the
entire truth to the best of my knowledge.”
That is signed by Hermann Neubauer and
witnessed by myself Agent Fisher.
The Attorney General. I will have this document marked for
identification.
(The
third statement of Hermann
Neubauer
was marked Exhibit
P-237
for identification.)
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q I
show you an exhibit marked P-237, dated July 3, 1942. Is this the third statement you took from
Neubauer?
1744
A That
is correct.
Q Did
he sign it?
A Yes,
sir, he signed it.
1745
Q Was
it taken under the same circumstances as the other two statements were taken,
that you have already testified to?
A Yes,
sit, that is correct.
The Attorney General. I offer Exhibit P-237 in evidence and ask
that the witness read it.
Colonel Royall. There is no objection by the defendant
Neubauer: the same stipulation applies as to the others.
(Statement of defendant Neubauer,
Exhibit P-237, was read by the witness as follows.
EXHIBIT P-237
“I.
Hermann Otto Neubauer, make the following voluntary statement to W.W. Fisher,
and B.V. Emrich, whom I know to be Special Agents of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation, United States Department of Justice. No Threats or promises have been made to me
in securing this statement and I have been advised that it may be used in
court.
“I
decided that I would give the money which I had been given in the money belt by
Lieutenant Kappe to Harry Jaques in
“On
either Monday or Tuesday night, June 22 or 23, 1942, at approximately 10
P.M. I called Harry Jaques by telephone
from the Sedgewick El station in
1746
for a few minutes. I also asked him whether anybody was at home
with him. Jaques told me that only he
and his wife were at home and that I could come right on up.
“I
then walked directly to the Jaques home at
“As
we were going into the living room I said: ‘I guess it looks kind of funny for
me, a stranger, to drop in on you, you don’t know me.’ I then told them that I
would tell them who I was in a minute.
“I
next asked them whether they know Alma Wolf and they looked kind of funny and
then I said that I was her husband. Mrs.
Jaques then asked me where my scars were and where I was in the hospital. I told her I was in the hospital at
“I
then told Mrs. Jaques that I knew her sister and brother-in-law and that her sister
visited me while I was in the hospital and she said ‘then you must be Hermann
Neubauer’ and that she thought she remembered me as X had looked familiar to
her when I walked in, but she could not place me.
“After
we had talked about our families in
1747
that I told Harry Jaques that I had
arrived on a submarine and I told him also that I was here to do some work for
the German Government. I do not remember
whether I mentioned to him that it was sabotage work, but I definitely feel
that he got that impression because he immediately told me that he didn’t want
to hear any more about it. I told Mr.
Jaques that I had seen somebody already, I did not mention any name, and that
he told me that quite a few Germans had been picked up and put in concentration
camp.
“I
showed Mr. Jaques my Registration card on which my name appeared Henry
Nicholas, and told him I was going under that name and was living at the La
Salle Hotel in town.
Sometime
during this conversation his wife came in with the coffee and sandwiches. We then went on talking about
“During
the conversation Mrs. Jaques mentioned to me that she had received a letter
from Mrs. Maria Kerling in which Mrs. Kerling told her about her illness, and
Mrs. Jaques also said that she was still paying for a suitcase or trunk
belonging to me. I then told them that
Maria Kerling’s husband, Edward Kerling, had come over with me and that I was
going to see him soon, but I did not tell them where he was in the United
States.
1748
“I
told them I had some money here and asked them if it would be all right for
them to keep it for me. I also said that
I would pick it up later and that I would probably not take it all at
once. I had the money in two envelopes
bearing the return address of the La Salle Hotel,
“I
then counted out $200.00 (two hundred dollars) from one of the envelopes and
put it in my wallet. I then took the two
envelopes with the remaining money and placed them in one envelope that was
given to me by Mrs. Jaques and placed it on the coffee table.
“We
talked for a while longer and then I left the apartment at about 2 A.M. the
next morning and returned to my hotel room.
“On
Friday night, June 26, 1942, at about 10 o’clock I again returned to their
apartment and we continued our conversation with regard to our relatives in
“During
our talk they mentioned that they had heard on a news broadcast something with
regard to aliens
1749
being landed in the
“On
the visit this evening to the Jaques home we did not again talk of my coming to
this country or my purpose for being in the country. They, however, asked me whether I wanted some
of the money and I told them ‘No, I do not need any at this time.’
“I
remained at the Jaques apartment until approximately 12:30 A.M. the next
morning and then returned to my hotel room.
Just before leaving I told them that I would most likely see them during
the next week. I did not get an
opportunity to see the Jaques again before my arrest.
“I
have read this statement consisting of three (3) pages and it is true to the
best of my knowledge.
(Signed)
“Hermann Otto Neubauer.
Hermann Otto Neubauer
“witnessed by:
“E.V. Emrich
“Special Agent
“W.W. Fisher
“Special Agent
“Federal Bureau of Investigation
“United States Department of Justice
“607 U.S. Court House
“
“
Questions by the Attorney
General
Q In
one of his signed statements, I think the defendant Neubauer stated that he got
his uniform from the submarine; is that correct? In one of his signed
statements, I understand that he first said he got his uniform from the
1750
submarines.
A I
understood that he got--I understand the statement to read that he got it just
immediately before he got on the submarine.
Q Just
before he got on the submarine where?
A It
would have been in
Q You
stated that Neubauer had discussed his plans with Haupt in
A It
was on the Sunday that they met at one-thirty p.m. at the Chicago Theatre. That
was June 21.
Q As
a result of information given you by Neubauer, did you go to the Jaques house
at
A Yes,
I did.
Q What
did you find there?
A Upon
arriving at the house, I talked to Mrs. Jaques, and after she at first denied
that she had the money, she finally said that she did.
Colonel Royall. We object.
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q Do
not say what Mr. Jaques told you. As a
result of what Mrs. Jaques told you, what did you find?
A We
found $3,600 in an envelope which was hidden in a 5-gallon coffee can in the
pantry off the kitchen in that apartment.
Q Was
she present when you found it?
A She
pulled it out of the can.
1751
Q Was
her husband present also?
A Her
husband was not present.
Q In
what denomination was the money?
A There
were 72 $50 bills.
The Attorney General. That is all.
CROSS-EXAMINATION
Questions by Colonel Royall:
Q Who
was with you at the time these statements were taken? What other F.B.I. agents?
A Special
Agent W.W. Fisher.
Q Anyone
else?
A On
one occasion, for approximately one-half hour, Agent Ear Hirsh of the
Q You
observed when you first saw the defendant Neubauer that he had sustained
certain wounds, did you not?
A That
is true.
Q You
also noted that he was in an extremely nervous condition, did you not?
A
That is true.
Q Is
it not a fact that his condition was such that you or someone in your presence
suggested that he might need hospital treatment?
A No,
sir.
Q Was
that discussed?
A No,
sir.
Q Was
it discussed that he might need a physician?
A No,
sir.
Q Did
he have a physician?
1752
A He
did.
Q Who
provided the physician for him?
A As
a usual custom, we call in a physician immediately when we bring in a prisoner
to the office.
Q was
he given some medicine or treatment at that time for nervousness?
A Not
to my knowledge.
Q You
do not recall any prescription being given him?
A Not
to my knowledge, no, sir.
Q Did
you at any time examine his wounds or the nature of them? Did you make any
examination of them?
A He
exhibited his wounds to us, but I make no physical examination.
Q what
did that consist of? Where were they located?
A There
is a wound right alongside his right ear, and also he has a considerable wound
on his leg.
Q Did
he tell you where those wounds were sustained?
A Yes,
he explained.
Q In
the Russian campaign?
A In
the Russian campaign.
Q He
told you that he had been from time to time confined in a military hospital,
did he?
A That
is correct.
Q He
told you that upon his being discharged from the hospital and while still being
a member of the armed forces he was ordered from his regiment to this school,
did he not?
A
That is correct.
Q And
that he went there because he was ordered?
A No,
sir.
1753
Q He
just stated he was ordered?
A I really can’t answer that question that
way.
Q But
he did say he was ordered to go to the school?
A Yes,
he received the orders.
Q Did
he tell you that at the time he was ordered as a soldier to go to school, he
did not know the type of work that would be required of him?
A Will
you repeat the question?
Q Did
he tell you that when he received his orders to go to the school he did not
know the type of work that he was expected to engage in at the school?
A Sir,
I hesitate to answer that question on account of the order part.
Q I
am not seeking to mislead you in any way, but did he tell you that when he want
to the school he did not know the type of work he was to do?
A That
is correct.
Q He
told you that after he got there he found that the nature of the work expected
of him was sabotage in
A Yes,
sir.
Q That
was the word he used in his statements and that you used in your questioning in
describing it, wasn’t it?
A Yes,
sir.
Q Did
he tell you that he was specifically instructed no to engage in any activity
that would endanger human life?
A With
regard to the railroad transportation, yes.
Q Did
he not tell you that they had definite instructions, in addition to the
railroad transportation, not to injure anyone?
A No,
sir
1754
Q He
did not tell you that?
A No,
sir.
Q What,
if anything, did he tell you about his nervous condition after he reached
A I
don’t recall any particular statements.
Q Did
he state that he had been extremely nervous since he was wounded?
A Yes,
sir.
Q Did
he tell you that at times he was threatened with what is known as a nervous
breakdown?
A No,
sir.
Q Did
he tell you that during the entire course of the school he from time to time
suffered, as a result, from nervousness?
A Yes,
sir.
Q And
that he also suffered that way on his trip here and after he arrived in
A On
his trip here, yes, sir.
Q Did
he tell you that as a result of that nervousness he had, shortly after his
arrival, reached the conclusion that he would not try to carry out his plan?
A No,
sir.
Q Did
he tell you he had at any time abandoned the intention to carry out his plan?
A No,
sir.
Q Who
was present during his statement at times when you were not present? Anyone?
A Well,
I was present during the entire time that each one of these statements was
dictated.
1755
the
actual dictation of the statement was carried out, we, of course—I, of course,
questioned him virtually the entire time in order to get an idea of what we
were going to put in the statement.
There may have been periods of time of maybe five or ten minutes when I
was out of the room and just Agent Fisher and some other agent might have been
in with him.
Colonel Royall. That is all we care to ask.
The President. There seem to be no questions by the
Commission. The witness is excused.
The Attorney General. Agent
Lieutenant Page. Mr. Charles H. Stanley. This witness has been sworn to secrecy.
Colonel Munson. Mr. Stanley, you are reminded that you are
still under oath.
Mr. Stanley. Yes, sir.
CHARLES H. STANLEY
was
recalled as a witness for the prosecution and, having been previously duly
sworn, testified further as follows:
DIRECT EXAMINATION
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q Do
you know the defendant Neubauer, Mr. Stanley?
A Yes,
sir.
Q Is
this the defendant Neubauer here (indicating)?
A Yes.
Q Did
you show him this cap, marked as Exhibit P-22 for identification?
A Yes,
sir, I did.
Q What
did he say about that?
1756
A He
said this was a German military cap, one similar to the cap issued to him and
the other members of his group in
He said at the time he left the
submarine, on landing on the coast of
Q Did
he say what kind of cap it was?
A He
said it was a German military cap.
Q I
show you Exhibit P-24, a duffel bag. Did
you show that to the defendant Neubauer?
A Yes,
sir, I did.
Q What
did he say about that?
A He
said this was a duffel bag similar to the one brought by his group from
At the time they landed, their clothing
was in this bag, he said—in a bag similar to this.
Q I
show you Exhibits P-32 and P-39 and ask you whether you showed these to the
defendant Neubauer. They are a pair of
pants and a coat.
A Yes,
sir, I did.
Q What
did he say about them?
A He
said this was a similar type uniform to that issued to his and the other
members of his group in Berlin and worn by them on the submarine to America;
and when they landed they changed from the uniform as they landed in Florida on
June 17.
The Attorney General. Cross-examine.
1757
Colonel Royall. No questions.
The President. The witness may be excused.
1758
The Attorney General. I will call Agent Foster.
Colonel Royall. If the Commission please, I wonder if we
might have a five-minute recess, since we are about to take up another
defendant.
The President. We will have a short recess of ten minutes.
(A
brief informal recess was taken, at the conclusion of which the following
occurred:)
The President. The session is open. Proceed, please.
Lieutenant Page. This witness, Mr. Foster, has been sworn to
secrecy.
Colonel Munson. You are reminded that you are still under
oath.
H. G. FOSTER
was
recalled as a witness for the prosecution and, having been previously duly sworn,
testified further as follows:
DIRECT EXAMINATION
Question
by the Attorney General:
Q Mr.
Foster, did you apprehend Werner Thiel?
A He
was apprehended by Special Agents in Charge T. J. Donegan and Spencer J.
Drayton. I was present, as well as
Special Agent Emrich, C. F. Lannan, W. W. Fisher, and B. D. Rice.
Q When?
A On
the night of June 23, 1942.
Q At
what time?
A Between
11:30 and 11:50 p. m.
Q Certain
waivers were taken. Who took them? Do you remember?
A Those
were taken later.
1759
Q Where
did you apprehend him?
A He
was apprehended just a few feet west of the entrance to the Commodore Hotel on
Q Where
was he taken?
A To
the office of the F.B.I. in
Q What
time in the evening did you say it was?
A The
arrest occurred between 11:30 and 11:50 p. m.
The Attorney General. I will ask the reporter to mark these
documents
(Three
waivers signed by Werner
Thiel were respectively marked
P-238, P-239 and P-240 for
Identification.)
I offer in evidence P-238, P-239 and
P-240, being waivers signed by the defendant Thiel, with the understanding that
there is no objection to these waivers being received in evidence.
Does the Commission care to see them?
The President. No, thank you.
(Three
waivers signed by Werner
Thiel,
previously marked P-238,
P-239
and P-240 for identification,
were
received in evidence.)
Colonel Royall. I would like to ask a question for the
clarification of the record. Are these waivers
in each case identical in form except the one that I believe was altered in one
case? Are you able to tell me that? Is the waiver of each of the defendants
identical in form?
The Attorney General. I do not really know. I think they are substantially identical.
Mr. Hoover. Yes.
The Attorney General. Mr. Hoover tells me that they are
1760
identical
in form.
I will ask the reporter to mark these
exhibits.
(A
wallet handed to the reporter was marked P-241.
Photograph
of wallet was marked P-241-A.
A
Selective Service Registration certificate was marked P-242.
Photograph
of Registration certificate was marked P-242-A.
Social Security card of Thiel was
marked P-243-A for identification.)
Questions by the Attorney General:
Q I
show you an exhibit marked P-241 and ask you if you can identify it?
A Yes,
sir. This is a wallet which I removed
from the person of Mr. Werner Thiel.
Q Is
this (indicating) a photograph of the wallet, marked P-241-A?
A Yes,
sir.
The Attorney General. I offer P-241-A in evidence.
(Photograph
of wallet of Defendant
Thiel,
previously marked P-241-A for
identification, was received in
evidence.)
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q What
did you find in the wallet?
A A
Social Security card.
Q I
show you P-243. Is this the Social
Security card referred to?
A Yes,
sir. This is the Social Security card.
Q Is
P-243-A a photograph of the Social Security card?
A Yes,
sir.
The Attorney General. I offer P-243-A in evidence.
1761
(Photograph
of Thiel’s Social Security
card,
marked P-243-A for identification,
was received in evidence.)
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q What
else did you find in the wallet?
A A
draft registration certificate for Selective Service.
Q I
show you P-242. Is that the Registration
Certificate to which you refer?
A It
is.
Q Did
Thiel say whether or not he had written anything on that certificate?
A He
did not say at the time.
Q Did
he ever tell you whether or not he wrote anything on that card?
A That
name, “William Thomas”; yes, sir.
Q He
said he wrote that name on it?
A Yes.
Q When
did he say he wrote it on that card?
A After
we arrived at the office.
Q I
do not mean when he told you, but when was the writing put on that card, if he
told you that?
A At
the time I originally asked him he did not tell me when he put it on.
Q Did
he ever tell you when he wrote that name on the card?
A No,
sir
Q Did
he tell you who gave him the card?
A No,
sir.
Q Is
this (indicating) a photograph of the Registra-
1762
tion
Certificate, marked P-242-A?
A Yes,
sir.
The Attorney General. I offer P-242-A in evidence.
(Photograph
of Registration Certificate of
Thiel,
previously marked P-242-A for
identification, was received in
evidence.)
Questions by theAttorney
General:
Q What
else did you find in the pocketbook?
A There
was also some money in the pocketbook.
Q How
much?
A I
removed $544.06 in its entirety from his clothes. A portion of that was in his wallet.
Q Do
you remember the denominations of the
money?
A One
50, some 20’s, some 10’s and some 1’s.
The Attorney General. I will ask the reporter to mark this card.
(A
hotel receipt was marked
P-244 for identification.)
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q I
show you P-244 and ask you whether or not you can identify it?
A Yes,
sir. This is a receipt from the hotel
for a room.
Q Where
did you find it?
A It
was also in the wallet.
Q Did
you ask him about this?
A Yes,
sir.
Q What
did he say about it?
A He
said that this was his room receipt at the Commodore Hotel.
1763
Q Is
this (indicating) a photograph of the room receipt?
A Yes,
sir.
(Photograph
of hotel room receipt
was marked P-244-A for identification.)
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q Will
you read it, please?
A (
(EXHIBIT P-244-A)
“Important. Please read.
We have your name and room rate listed as follows. If incorrect, kindly advise floor clerk at
once.”
That is signed “William Thomas,” and
on the lower left-hand corner above the word “Room” appears the number 908, and
in the center of the card it says “Rate,” and that is blank; and on the right
hand corner of the card the work “Clerk” with a “C” over that word.
The Attorney General. I offer this photograph in evidence, being
P-244-A.
(Hotel
room receipt previously
marked
P-244-A for identification
was received in evidence.)
Questions
by the Attorney General:
Q Did
you find anything else in the pocketbook?
A No,
sir.
The Attorney General. Cross examine.
Colonel Royall. No questions.
The President. There seem to be no questions. The witness is excused.
(The witness left the
stand.)
1764
The Attorney General. I will call Mr. Gleason.
Lieutenant Page. This witness has not been sworn to secrecy.
Colonel Munson. Mr. Gleason, will you show your card to the
reporter so that he will get your name correctly?
Mr. Gleason. Yes, sir (showing the reporter the card
referred to).
Colonel Munson. Mr. Gleason, all witnesses before this
Commission, besides taking the usual oath required of a witness, take an oath
of secrecy. The Commission instructs me
to inform you that violation of the pledge of secrecy taken in that oath may be
punished by contempt proceedings or by other proceedings of a criminal nature. In taking the oath, therefore you understand
that to be the fact?
Mr. Gleason. Yes, sir.
Colonel Munson. You solemnly swear that you will not divulge
the proceedings taken at this trial to anyone outside of this court room until
released from your obligation by proper authority or required so to do by such
proper authority?
Mr. Gleason. I do.
Colonel Munson. You swear that the evidence you shall now
give in the case on hearing will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but
the truth, so help you God?
Mr. Gleason. I do.
JOHN J. GLEASON, JR.,
was called as a witness for the prosecution
and testified as follows:
Colonel Munson. Please state your name, office address, and
occupation.
1765
The Witness. John J. Gleason, Special Agent, Federal
Bureau of Investigation,
The Attorney General. I will ask the reporter to mark this document
for identification.
(Statement
of Defendant Thiel was
marked P-245 for identification.)
DIRECT EXAMINATION
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q I
show you what has been marked for identification as P-245 and ask you what it
is.
A The
signed statement that Special Agent J. D. McKinney and I took from Werner Thiel
on June 25, 1942.
Q Will
you point him out?
A That
is the gentleman right here (indicating).
Q Next
to counsel?
A Yes,
sir.
Q When
was the statement taken?
A It
was taken—you mean, the statement itself?
Q Yes,
sir.
A Thiel
was questioned from 9 o’clock in the morning until noon.
Q Of
what day?
A On
the 24th of June?
Q In
the
A Yes,
sir. He was questioned by me personally
from 9 o’clock in the morning until shortly after noon, and then from
approximately 5:30 until 9 o’clock; and then the following morning he was
questioned from 10 until 12:30, and at 2:30 we started taking the statement and
concluded at 8:30.
1766
Q When
did you complete it?
A At
8:30 on June 25, 1942.
Q What
agents were present during those days?
A On
June 24, Special Agent J. D. McKinney, from 5:30 to 7:30. Special Agent W. W. Fisher stayed with
us. During that time we obtained
waivers. We also had other questions of
him concerning the statement. Then for
about two hours on the 25th Special Agent B. D. Rice was
present. The remainder of the time just
Agent McKinney and I questioned him.
Q Did
he sign the statement?
A Yes,
sir.
Q And
it was witnessed?
A Yes,
sir.
Q By
whom?
A By
J. D. McKinney and myself.
Q Did
the defendant Thiel sign each page of the statement?
A Yes,
sir.
Q Did
he read the statement?
A Yes,
sir.
Q Did
he make corrections himself in the statement when he read it?
A Yes,
sir. He made corrections when he read
it, and he made corrections while it was being dictated. He was present at that time, and anything that
he did not want to go in there, he said so at the time.
Q Did
he initial the corrections in the statement?
A Yes,
sir.
Q And
they were made before he signed it?
1767
A They
were made before he signed it.
The Attorney General. I offer the statement marked P-245 in
evidence and ask the witness to read it.
Colonel Royall. May it please the Commission, I would like to
examine this witness as to the admissibility of this statement, before it is
received in evidenced.
The Attorney General. There is no objection to that.
Questions by Colonel Royall:
Q Mr.
Gleason, what time was he apprehended?
A I
was not present at the apprehension of Thiel.
Q You
do not know how long he had been in custody when you first came there?
A I
began questioning him at 9 a. m., June 24, and it was my belief at that time
that he had been in custody since perhaps midnight.
Q Who
had him in custody from midnight on?
A That
I cannot answer; I do not know.
Q Did
you see Agent Donegan with him at any time?
A I
have never seen Agent Donegan with Theil.
Q Who
delivered him to you?
A Special
Agents Drayton, Rice and Stanley.
Q He
did not make any statement to you about any mistreatment he had received, did
he?
A On
the contrary, he told me, in answer to a direct question which I asked him
concerning his treatment, that everything was satisfactory with the possible
exception of the fact that a gentleman with a gray streak in the front of his
hair questioned him and swore at him and scolded him.
Q He
did not tell you that Mr. Donegan had struck him?
1768
A He
didn’t say that Mr. Donegan had struck him; and he told the doctor in my
presence that he had not been struck, at 9:30 a. m., on June 25.
1769
Q Of
course, you don’t know what transpired before that, do you?
A No.
Q Were
you with him then constantly from that time on until this statement was
completed?
A From
9 a.m., yes, I was, on June 24th.
From the tie I originally took over I was with him constantly until the
time he signed the statement.
Colonel Royall. Now, may it please the Commission, before
this statement is received in evidence and before the Commission rules on it, I
would like to have the privilege of examining the agent Rice as to what occurred
during the period before this agent took possession of Thiel.
The Attorney General. I have no objection. The only evidence is that the statement was
properly taken. We can have this witness
removed and put on Rice.
The President. You wish whom?
Colonel Royall. Rice.
He was on the stand before. I
wish to examine him about this statement.
(Witness temporarily excused.)
The President. We will recall Special Agent Rice. Did you get that name?
Lieutenant Page. B. D. Rice.
This witness has been sworn.
The President. All right, sir.
Colonel Munson. Mr. Rice, you are reminded that you are still
under oath.
Mr. Rice. Yes, sir.
1770
B. D. RICE
was
recalled as a witness for the prosecution and, having been previously duly
sworn, testified further as follows:
FURTHER CROSS EXAMINATION
Questions by Colonel Royall:
Q Mr.
Rice, did you apprehend the defendant Thiel?
A I
did not apprehend him. I was present
when he was apprehended.
Q Who
was present at the time?
A Special
Agent in Charge D. J. Donegan, Special Agent in Charge Spencer J. Drayton,
Special Agent H. G. Foster, Special Agent W. w. Fisher, and Special Agent C. F.
Lanman.
Q What
time was he taken into custody?
A My
recollection is that it was just about 11:30 at night.
Q What
part of the night were you with him.
A I
first saw him about 9:15 p.m. on June 23rd.
Q What
time did you arrest him?
A About—I
did not arrest him there, but he was arrested.
Q What
time was he arrested, I mean.
A To
my recollection it was between 11:00 and 11:30.
Q From
the time of his arrest during what period were you with him.
A After
his arrest he was taken to an automobile and asked what room he was staying in
at the Commodore Hotel. I then went up
with a search waiver and contacted the acting manager of the hotel and assisted
in the search of the room that Thiel occupied with Kerling.
1771
Q Would
you mind answering my question? What
period were you with him in his presence from 11:30 on, say, until 9 the next
morning?
A I
then returned to the office about—
Q Were
you with him when you went to the hotel?
A No,
sir.
Q That
is what I have been trying to find out.
When were you with him.
A Starting
about 1:30 o’clock in the morning, I was with him until shortly after 9.
Q In
the morning?
A Yes,
sir.
Q During
the time you were with him did he complain of any mistreatment given him by
Agent Donegan?
A No,
sir.
Q He
did not say anything about it?
A No,
sir.
Q Were
you present when he mentioned it to Mr. Gleason?
A I
do not recall of his making any complaints.
I do recall that the doctor asked him if he had any complaints and he
said no.
Q Did
not he tell you that Agent Donegan had talked rough to him?
A I
do not recall his saying about being talked to roughly.
Q Did
he tell you that he had been struck and his hair pulled?
1772
A No,
sir.
Q Who
was with him during the period you were not with him?
A That
is going to be pretty hard to tell.
Q I
mean, which agents were with him at the time you were not with him; don’t you
know that?
A That
is going to be pretty hard to say.
Q You
don’t know?
A Just
what period are you referring to?
Q You
say he was apprehended about 11:30. From
11:30 to one something who was with him?
A I
could not say.
Q You
don’t know?
A I
know when I last saw him and when I saw him again.
Q Who
was with him when you last saw him?
A When
I last saw him he was in a car with Special Agent C. G. Stanley and Special
Agent in Charge Drayton, and at that time Special Agent in Charge Donegan
turned Thiel over to us to continue questioning him.
Q Was
Donegan the only one with him at that time when he turned him over to you?
A As
far as I know, he was.
Q How
much sleep did Thiel get that night from 11:30 until 9 the next morning?
A Between
11:30 and 1:30 I cannot say.
1773
Q From
1:30 on?
A From
1:30 on until 9 o’clock the next morning he did not sleep any.
Q Was
he questioned continuously during that period?
A We
were talking to him the best we could.
He was rather reticent and for some periods of time he would not speak,
but we were attempting to talk to him during that entire time.
Q How
many of you were with him trying to talk to him?
A There
were three of us.
Colonel Royall. I believe that is all I care to ask him.
The Attorney General. That is all.
The President. The witness is excused.
(The witness left the
stand.)
The Attorney General. Bring Mr. Gleason back.
The President. Who do you wish now, sir?
Colonel Royall. I do not care for any other examination on
that feature of it.
JOHN J. GLEASON, JR.
was
recalled as a witness for the prosecution and, having been previously duly
sworn, testified further as follows:
Colonel Munson. The witness is reminded he is still under
oath.
DIRECT EXAMINATION—RESUMED
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q Will
you read Thiel’s statement, Mr. Gleason?
I have offered it in evidence.
Colonel Royall. You have offered it in evidence?
The Attorney General. I have offered it.
1774
Colonel Royall. The defendant Thiel has no basis upon which he
can object at this time. The other
defendants have the same stipulation.
(First
statement of Defendant Thiel
was
thereupon received in evidence
as Exhibit P-245 and is as follows:)
EXHIBIT P-245
The Witness (reading):
“
June
25, 1942
“I, Werner Thiel, make the following
voluntary statement to J. D. McKinney and J.
J. Gleason, whom I know to be Special Agents of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation, Department of Justice. I
make this statement freely and voluntarily, no coercion or premises having been
made to me to do so, knowing that it may be used against me in courts.
“I, Werner Thiel, was born March 29,
1907, at
1775
Guenter Otto, 22 years of age, who is
in the army also, presently convalescing from the loss of his left eye. Our sisters are Agathe Thiel, who is 38 years
of age and resides at home and who is employed in office work; Hilde Thiel, who
is 36 years of age and resides at home and is employed in office work; Liesel
(Louise), 27 years of age, who resides at home and is employed in office work,
and Jennie Thiel, who is 24 years of age and resides at home, where she helps
my mother in her house duties.
“I was educated in the public schools
at
“This employment continued until the
fall of 1925, when the firm became bankrupt, which resulted in
1776
my being laid off. In the fall of 1925 until April, 1927, which
is the date of my departure for the
“I arrived in the United States some
time in April, 1927, at the Port of New York, on the ‘S. S. Cleveland’ of the
Hamburg-American Line, and from New York I immediately went to Detroit, where I
lived for a couple of weeks with a family named Neumann, who were related to an
uncle of mine.
“Shortly after my arrival in
“I remained there for several months
and then resigned and went to work for Peerless Pattern Company, Detroit,
Michigan, where I worked as a metal pattern maker and later as an inspector,
but due to hard times, in November, 1929 I was laid off.
“I remained unemployed from November,
1929 until April, 1930, at which time I went to work for the
1777
Fisher Bodies Company, which work
lasted for six weeks. I was then laid
off because of this being seasonal work.
While at Fisher’s, I received $60.00 a week. On May 15, 1930, I obtained work with the
Chevrolet Motors company at
“At this time, I came to
“Around the end of June, 1934, I
obtained a job at the Betz Company, at
1778
bad, I was laid off from work at the
Betz Company around May or June, 1935, at which time I obtained a job with the
Kellogg Construction Company, whose main office is around
“I remained at this position until
January, 1936, when I was laid off, and at this time obtained a job with the
Pacific Pump Company at
“I then took a sight-seeing trip from
1779
“This job lasted until December 1,
1936, when I resigned and went to For Myers,
“At this time I was advised by an
acquaintance named Frank, whose last name I cannot recall, that the Budd
Company at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, was hiring people, so I then went to
Philadelphia and obtained a job in the Budd Company’s auto die shop, which
lasted for a few weeks, up until October, 1937.
This also being seasonal work, I was then laid off. I then returned to
“In January, 1938, I went to work with
the Natisch Gear Works,
1780
“I wish to state, at this time, that I
am a member of the National Socialist Party in
“In 1934, when I went to
“Then I went to
1781
thing to do with the group out
there. I came back to
“In 1938, while at
“I always had a desire to return home
to see my family. In October, 1940, I
learned of the opportunity to return to
1782
gation of the German Consul in
“Around the middle of March, 1941, I was
supplied with tickets for my passage to
“I wish to state at this time that upon
my arrival at Detroit in 1927, I applied for my declaration of intention, which
was subsequently issued, and the, after the receipt of these papers, I did not
take out final United States citizenship papers because I could not decide
whether I intended to remain in this country or go back to Germany.
“Regarding my trip back to
“After boarding the ‘Tatuta Maru’, we
were sixteen days in crossing to
1783
“While I was at home, I rested up. I did not have any part activities, and
nobody contacted me. In July, 1941, I
decided to go to
1784
rooming house, which was located at
“During this time of employment, in
July, 1941, I went to the Auslands office in Berlin and told them that I was
not in Berlin, having returned from Dortmund, and was presently residing in
that city and I wished to be transferred to the local group, I attended only
one meeting, but continued to pay my dues.
From this period on, up until April 1, 1942, I continued to work for the
Feilers Feinmechanic Company, living a normal working man’s life.
“However, one night around the middle
of March, 1942, I attended a social meeting of the Auslands Group, at which
time I met Walter Kappe, whom I had met in
1785
and I made arrangements to meet
together about a week later at a small bar in
“I met Dasch at the bar, as arranged,
and, during the evening, he asked me if I would like to go back to the
“Around
the end of March, he wrote to me, while I was thinking the proposition
over. His letter requested me to see him
at 6 Rank Str. In
“Around
April first, I resigned my job with the Feilers Feinmechanic Company and went
home to
1786
met Kappe, Reinhold Barth, and a few
other men, who later turned out to be my colleagues at the school.
“I
remained here about an hour, and then all of us were taken to the Berlin
Potademer Station, where we took the train to
“From
Wednesday until Saturday of this week, we did nothing in the way of school work
and merely used our time in getting acquainted with each other, playing sports,
reading American newspapers and magazines, and during this time Kappe told us
that there were going to be some fellows here to teach us to make some
explosives. This school was operated by
Lieutenant Walter Kappe and Special Leader Reinhold Barth. However, I wish to say that to this date I do
not know what Department of the German Government was responsible for the
operation of the school.
“On
Sunday night of this first week, the instructors, who I knew to be Dr. Schultze
and Koenig, whose first names I do not know, arrived, and we students were
introduced to them. The students were,
as I
1787
remember (phonetic) George Dasch,
Richard Quientas, Heink, Swede or Jerry Swenson; Scotty, who was from Hamburg,
and later dropped out of school; Ernest Zuber, who later dropped out of school
also; Herbert Haupt, Herman Neubauer, Eddie Kerling, Pete Burger, and myself.
“Prior
to the arrival of the instructors, we students were placed in two groups –
namely, there was one under the charge of Dasch as leader, including Quientas,
Heink, Burger, Heink, Swede Swenson, and Scotty; whereas, in Eddie Kerling’s
group were Haupt, Neubauer, Zuber, and myself.
“Starting
Monday, around April 13th, the first week of school, we had classes
from 9:00 A.M. to 12:00 noon and two hours in the afternoon, receiving
instructions on making of explosives, things that burned easily, incendiaries,
detonators, timing instruments, and principles of chemistry. During the second week of school, we studied
and experimented with some of the explosives and detonators. During the evenings, while at the school, we
usually read, talked, drank beer, and generally amused ourselves in this
fashion.
“The
third week of school we were given practical problems in which we had to go out
and blow up objects without being detected, and we also discussed the use of
secret writings and their formulas. The
secret writing materials were taught to us in about two hours.
1788
We were instructed to use
phenolphthalein and ammonia as a writing fluid and to develop this we were to
use three spoons of cigarette ashes and two spoons of water, or glycerine could
be used.
“The
school was completed around April 29th when we were to begin a
vacation, being instructed to report on May 12th at
“At
this time I wish to state that while we were in school we were instructed to
make out a story for use in
“On
April 29th, I left school and went home and I remained there until
May 11th, at which time I returned to
“On
Thursday, May 14th, we all went to a small town near Wittenburg in
the State of
“In
the course of the school, we were told that there were three aluminum plants in
the East, which
1789
section our group was to cover, one
being in North Carolina, one in New York, near Buffalo, and the third one I
don’t remember just where, perhaps Virginia, which we were to attempt to
disable.
“We
remained at this little town, whose name I cannot recall, for the night, and on
Friday, May 15th, we went to see another aluminum plant, which was
near Wittenburg, and looked over the power stations and so forth. After this trip, we returned to
1790
“On either Tuesday,
Wednesday, or Thursday, while at the office on Ranke Street, we were all give
Draft Board and Social Security cards, having our fictitious names thereon,
mine being William Thomas.
“About
the same time we were issued the Social Security cards and Draft Registration
Cards, Kappe and a man whose name I do not know gave each of us a contract to
sign, which contained a pledge that we would do our best for the Fatherland and
pledge ourselves to secrecy regarding the work.
It also contained a clause for the benefit of the families left in
“On
Friday, May 22nd, we all left Berlin, bringing with us four boxes of
explosive equipment, for Pairs, France, and arrived there Saturday, the 23rd. We all stayed in a hotel near the
Louvre. We remained here until Monday
night, doing nothing but sightseeing.
“On
Monday, the 25th, we took a train to
1791
“While
I was at the hotel, Kappe came to my room and gave me a money belt containing I
believe $450 and $500 in cash as pocket money.
It is my understanding that the rest of the colleagues in this group
received similar money belts, with the exception of my leader Kerling, who
received a considerable amount more. Of
course, there was not an exact understanding about it, but we always assumed
that in case we ran short of money we would receive more from Kerling.
“Around
8:00 P.M. on the 26th, we boarded a German submarine, and about an
hour later, sailed from
“After
burying this material, we all started walking fast up the beach for a couple of
hours, and, as it became light, we saw buildings in the distance
1792
and later learned that is was
“At
this time I wish to state that during my stay in
“I
arrived in
“Kerling
and I arrived in
1793
the morning after we left
“Monday
morning, June 22 1942, at about 10:00 o’clock, I went to visit an old friend of
mine, Anthony Cramer, of 171 East 83rd Street, New York City, whom I
knew in Detroit, Michigan, when we roomed together in 1929 and whom I worked
with at Hammond, Indiana, in 1936 and later knew in New York up to the time I
returned to Germany in March, 1941.
Cramer was not home, so I left a note form him to meet me that night at
9:00 P.M. at the Information Booth in Grand Central Station.
“Cramer
came to Grand Central Station at 9:00 P.M., and we went to a tavern at the
corner of
“Cramer
and I met again the next night at about 8:00 o’clock at the same tavern, and we
spent the evening together again. I told
him, during the course of the evening, that I had a money belt that I wanted
him to keep for me a while because I didn’t want to carry it around with me. He agreed to
1794
take it, so I took it off in the toilet
of the tavern and give it to him on
“At
this time, I wish to state that at no time was I instructed by the school or
anyone in
“I
also wish to state at this time that both groups which were in school together
were known as the Pastorius Group.
“I
also wish to add the following information to this statement. In May, 1937, when I returned to New York
City from Fort Myers, Florida, I resided on East 83rd Street,
somewhere in the 150’s, near Lexington Avenue, correct address or name of the
operators of the rooming house, of which there were two, I cannot recall. Around the early part of 1938 I moved to 164
(?)
1795
“I
have read this statement, consisting of ten pages in addition to this page, and
it is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I have initialed the bottom of each of the
preceding pages and am signing this page, of my own free will.
“(Signed)
Werner Thiel
“Witnesses:
“J.D.
McKinney
“Special
Agent, Federal Bureau of Investigation,
“
“
“J.J.
Gleason
“Special
Agent, F.B.I.
“
“
- - -
The Attorney General. I will ask that this statement be marked for
identification.
(Statement
of Werner Thiel dated
July 3,
1942, was marked as
Exhibit P-246 for identification.
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q Did
you take a second statement from Thiel?
A Yes,
I did.
Q When
did you take the second statement?
A On
July 3, 1942.
Q Did
he sign it?
A He
signed it.
Q Was
it taken under the same circumstances as the
1796
first
statement was taken?
A It
was taken under exactly the same circumstances.
Q I
show you Exhibit P-246 for identification.
Is that the second statement?
A This
is the second statement.
The Attorney General. I offer Exhibit P-246 in evidence and ask
that the witness read it.
Colonel Royall. There is no objection by the defendant Thiel;
there is the same stipulation as to the other defendants.
(Exhibit
P-246 for identification
was offered in evidence.)
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q Go
ahead.
A. (Reading)
“EXHIBIT
P-246
“
“July 3, 1942.
“I, Warner
Thiel, make the following supplementary statement to J.J. Gleason and J.D.
McKinney whom I know to be Special Agents of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation. I make this statement as
an addition to my original statement given on June 25, 1942, freely and
voluntarily, no threats or promises having been made to me to do so, and
knowing that it may be used in a Court of Law against me and having first been
advised that I do not have to make this statement.
“Concerning
the information that I previously furnished concerning the time while I was in
school at
1797
Cappe and Reinhold Barth at no time told us to sabotage
any particular war production plants, with the exception of three aluminum
factories in the East, they being, as I recall, one at Alcoa, Tennessee, one at
Mesaina, N.Y. near Buffalo, and I believe the other to have been somewhere in
North Carolina. As I recall now, an
aluminum plant at
“I wish to
state that prior to leaving school, Cappe and Barth advised the members of the
group that they did not know so much about the United States during war time,
and that our instructions were to look around for the most vulnerable spots in
the American aluminum industry plants; the Newark railroad yards; the vicinity
of the Hell Gate Bridge and disable them, this being left to our
discretion. I wish to state that we were
given no instructions to damage any other type of war industry while in this
country other than the aforementioned.
“Concerning
my activities after arrival in
1798
At the time of our approach to his house, which is on
“I wish to
state that Leiner, upon first seeing Eddie back in the country was quiet
surprised and he and Kerling talked about how Mrs. Kerling was getting along.
“During the
evening while we were at the Tavern Inn I requested Leiner to do me a favor, to
find my friend Anthony Kramer whose address was last know to be
1799
“On Monday
June 23rd, Tony Kramer met me at the Information Booth at Grand
Central Station and upon first seeing me he looked at me as though he could
hardly recognize me. Later Kramer told
me that when he looked at me he thought I first looked like Werner Thiel but
appeared not to be because of having lost weight, I having lost about 25 pounds
since he saw me last. Tony expressed
surprise upon seeing me and asked me why I was back in the
“During
that evening we talked generally about mutual friends of ours the majority of
whose names I cannot recall; one being August Kohorst who lives on
1800
numerous occasions, one being particularly Bernard Hermann
who is the former manager, presently running a saloon on
“I wish to
state regarding our landing in Florida, after we went in about 200 yards from
the beach and buried the boxes, I gave an army cap which I was wearing at the
time of landing to Herby Haupt, then went off with the cap and shovels which we
buried in the vicinity, the exact place I do not know. After this we walked up the beach for quite a
way, passing some houses, and as it became light we were able to see some city
buildings in the distance which later turned out to be
“In
additions to the information I have furnished in my previous statement
concerning the school held in
1801
I do not recall.
Lieut. Cappe instructed the men in my group not to tell these men what
we were doing in the class nor were we supposed to ask them for what purpose
they were attending the school. In
addition to the specific information which I furnished previously concerning
materials used in class, I wish to add that we were given two formulas that I
recall for making incendiaries. The
first one consisted of 3 parts of copper mortum mixed with one part aluminum
powder. This was to be ignited with a
fuse. The second formula as I recalled
it was a combination of saltpeter, sulphur and flour which was also to be ignited
with a fuse.
“We were
also taught how to make a timing device from an ordinary clock. We were told to take two pieces of wire one
of which was to be connected from a dry cell battery to the handle of the
clock. The other piece was to be
connected from the fuse to a certain place on the face of the block which was
taped underneath to prevent contact with the metal in the clock; the hand
coming around touching this wire would complete the circuit causing an
explosion.
“Concerning
the choosing of the three aluminum plants in the East which our group was to
handle, I wish to state that these were selected from various American
magazines by Reinhold Barth which he pointed out to us were to be attacked.
“While
attending the school on one occasion, a Doctor, who is unknown to me, taught us
secret writing,
1802
he told us that this course was for the purpose of writing
between us members after arriving in the
“Upon our
arrival in the
“I have
read the about statement consisting of this and three preceding pages and state
that it is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. I have initialed each page to show that it
1803
is true, and signed the last.
(Signed)
“Werner Thiel
“Werner Thiel.
“Witnessed by:
“John D. McKinney
“Special Agent.
“J.T.
Gleason
“Special agent,
“F.B.I.,
“
“(U.S. Court House) N.Y.C.”
1804
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q I
show you what has been marked for identification P-247. Of what is that a photograph?
A I
exhibited this picture to Werner Thiel in
“I identify
these four boxes as the boxes which were brought over on a submarine from
That is signed “Werner Thiel” and
witnessed by J. J. Gleason.
The Attorney General. I offer P-247 in evidence.
(Photograph
of boxes brought over on
submarine,
previously marked P-247
for identification, was received in evidence.)
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q I
show you Exhibits marked P-248 to P-255 both inclusive, and ask you what these photographs
represent. What are they photographs of?
A These
are photographs of the explosives, detonators, and incendiary materials brought
over here in those four boxes; and Thiel has written an individual
identification on each of these photographs.
Q In
his own handwriting and signed by him?
A In
his own handwriting and signed by him, yes, sir, in my presence, and witnessed
by me.
Q Read
the first one you have there.
A P-248. It is dated “7-1”, and the notation say:
“In center
foreground of picture are detonators and
1805
blocks which go with the detonators as
marked.
(Signed) “Werner Thiel”
Q Now,
the next one.
A P-249. It is dated 7-1-42 and says:
“Detonators
something similar to this were shown to the class in school in
(Signed) “Werner Thiel.”
Q The
next one?
A P-250. The picture is date 7-1 and says:
“Pen and
pencil set in picture similar to those show in school in
(Signed) “Werner Thiel.”
Q Now,
what about P-251?
A It
says:
“These
black boxes are timing devices which were demonstrated to us in school in
(Signed) “Werner Thiel.”
Q Now, P-252?
A It says:
“These are
similar to the shovels used by Kerling, Neubauer, Haupt and myself to bury the
four boxes which we brought from the submarine south of
(Signed) “Werner Thiel.”
Q What does it say on P-253?
A (
“The black
coils in this picture are fuses which were to be used with explosives. I saw similar fuses
1806
in school in
(Signed) “Werner Thiel.”
Q P-254?
A (
“This cap
is similar to the one which I wore from the submarine to the shore south of
(Signed) “Werner Thiel.”
Q And P-255?
A (
“These
timing device looks like the one I tested in school in
(Signed) “Werner Thiel.”
The Attorney General. I offer in evidence exhibits P-247 to P-255,
inclusive, and ask that they be spread in the original record.
(Photograph
of four boxes, marked P-247
for identification, was received in evidence.
Photograph
of detonators and blocks, previously
marked P-248 for identification, was received in evidence.
Photograph
showing detonators, previously marked
P-249 for identification was received in evidence.
Photograph
showing pen and pencil set, previously
marked P-250 for identification was received in evidence.
Photograph showing black boxes, previously marked P-251 for
1807
identification was received in evidence.
Photograph
showing two shovels, previously
marked for identification P-252 was received in evidence.
Photograph
showing black coils, previously
marked P-253 for identification was received in evidence.
Photograph
showing cap, previously marked
P-254 for identification was received in evidence.
Photograph
showing timing device, previously
marked P-255 for identification was received in evidence.)
The Attorney General. Cross examine.
CROSS EXAMINATION
Questions by Colonel Royall:
Q Mr.
Gleason, I believe you found from your conversations with the defendant Thiel
that he was not particularly well educated, did you not?
A I
found that he had the equivalent of a high school education.
Q Did
you find that he attended school only eight years, which would take him through
grammar school?
A No.
Q I
believe you found that some of his writings and expressions were not exactly
literate?
A In
English.
Q Did
you talk German to him?
A No. I do not speak German.
Q He
had been in
A From
April, 1927, until March, 1941.
Q Not
seeking in any way to mislead you: did he not
1808
tell
you, as embodied in this statement, that he went to school starting at six
years of age, and completed an eight-year course?
A He
did; from 1913 to 1921; and then he went for four years, evenings, obtaining
the equivalent of a high school education.
Q Did
he not say that the only thing he took in the evenings was an apprentice course
in mechanics?
A No.
Q Did
you find that all of his family connections were in
A To
the best of my knowledge and recollection, they were all in
Q If
in any of these matters you want to refer to the statement, you are at liberty
to do so.
A I
realize that.
Q I
am not trying to mislead you.
A All
right.
Q He
did tell you that he had one brother killed during the war, and another one
badly wounded, did he not?
A That
is right.
Q And
that that had happened shortly before he was approached by Kappe and Dasch
about going to the school?
A He
said that his brother was killed in
Q But
it was in March, 1942, when this matter of the school was brought to his
attention?
1809
A Yes.
Q He
told you, also, that when the matter was first broached to him he did not understand
exactly what its nature was?
A He
said they did not tell him what the nature of it was, other than to go to the
Q You
found in talking with him that on matters of detail and some matters of
importance he always said, “I left that to the leader of my group”?
A No.
Q You
found that in the case of his statement about the details of the trip that he
left them to Kerling? Did he not state
that on two occasions in his statement?
A He
stated that relative to the burying of the boxes and the place where they were
buried, he left that to Kerling.
Q When
he came to decide upon the school he did not inquire about it at all; he just
left that decision to the people who approached him, did he not?
A He
said he asked them what it was about.
Q And
they did not tell him?
A They
said it was to go to the
Q And
that is the only inquiry he made?
A To
my recollection, yes.
Q Did
he tell you that he was uncertain as to whether he would ever carry his plan
out; or what did he say about that?
A He
said that it was a difficult thing to decide, but he thought that there were
some things that he would do.
1810
However,
he did not want to kill anybody. He also
said that he supposed as time went on he probably would do some of those
things.
Q What
do you mean by “some of those things”?
A That
is what he said. That is a quotation.
Colonel Royall. All right sir. I do no thing I have anything else to ask
you.
Colonel Ristine. No questions.
The Attorney General. Does the Commission have any questions?
The President. No questions.
The witness may be excused.
(The witness left the
stand.)
The Attorney General. I have two witnesses who I do not thing will take
more than three or four minutes apiece.
That will finish the prosecution’s case completely. They are both Federal agents, and we are very
anxious to get them back to their work.
If the defense does not mind, we would like to put them on now.
The President. Please do.
The Attorney General. I will call Agent Charles H. Stanely.
Lieutenant Page. The witness has already been sworn.
Colonel Munson. The witness is reminded that he is still
under oath.
CHARLES H. STANLEY
was
recalled as a witness for the prosecution and, having been previously duly
sworn, testified further as follows:
1811
DIRECT EXAMINATION
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q You
have been sworn already, have you not, Mr. Stanley?
A Yes,
sir.
Q Did
you exhibit to the defendant Thiel certain articles of clothing?
A I
did, sir.
Q Did
you show him P-22, this cap?
A Yes,
sir; I did.
Q What
did he say about it?
A He
said this was a German Marine cap, and it was similar to the cap issued to him
in
Q Did
you show him this coat and pants, P-32 and P-39?
A Yes,
sir; I did.
Q What
did he say about them?
A He
said that they were similar to the uniform worn by him on the submarine and
obtained in
Q Did
you show him these shovels, P-28 and P-29?
A Yes,
sir; I did.
Q What
did he say about them?
A He
said that these shovels were either identical or similar to the ones used in
burying the explosives on the beach in
The Attorney General. Cross examine.
Colonel Royall. No cross-examination.
1812
The President. If there are no questions by the members of
the Commission, the witness will be excused.
(The witness left the
stand.)
The Attorney General. I will call Mr. John G. Willis.
Lieutenant Page. This witness has not been sworn to secrecy.
Colonel Munson. You have not been sworn in this case?
Mr. Willis. No, sir.
Colonel Munson. The Commission requires, in addition to the
oath that is usually administered to a witness, that an oath as to secrecy be
also administered. The Commission also
directs me to inform each witness taking that oath that a violation of the same
may result in contempt proceedings or other proceedings of a criminal
nature. In taking the oath, therefore,
you understand that to be the fact?
Mr. Willis. Yes, sir.
Colonel Munson. Hold up your right hand. Do you solemnly swear that you will not
divulge the proceedings taken at this trial to anyone outside of this court
room until released from you obligation by proper authority or required so to
do by such proper authority?
Mr. Willis. So help me God.
Colonel Munson. You swear that the evidence you show now give
in the case hearing will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the
truth, so help you God?
Mr. Willis. So help me God.
JOHN G. WILLIS
was
called as a witness for the prosecution and testified as follows
1813
Colonel Munson. Please state your name, office address, and
occupation.
The Witness. John G. Willis, Special Agent, Federal Bureau
of Investigations; presently assigned to the
DIRECT EXAMINATION
Questions by the Attorney
General:
Q On
June 29, 1942, did you go to the
A Yes,
sir.
Q Did
you have with you an authority from Anthony Cramer to open a box at the bank?
A Yes,
sir.
Q He
gave you authority to open the box, and you opened it?
A Yes,
sir.
Q What
did you find in that box?
A I
found 70 fifty-dollar bills.
Q You
saw Mr. Cramer and got his authority to go to the bank?
A Yes,
sir.
Q And
did Cramer state to you what the bills in his box were?
A He
told me the bills in his safe deposit box were the property of Werner Thiel,
his friend.
Q That
Thiel had given him?
A Yes,
sir.
Q And
you went down there and found them?
A Yes,
sir.
1814
The Attorney General. That is all.
Colonel Royall. No cross-examination.
The President. If there are no further questions, the
witness is excused.
(The witness left the
stand.)
The Attorney General. Mr. President, I would prefer not to close my
case technically until Monday, although that is all the evidence I expect to
have. I should like to ask counsel for
the defendants whether at this time they wish us to produce any other Federal
agents. We are very anxious to get all
of them back to their duties as soon as we can.
Colonel Royall. May it please the Commission so far as the
defendants whom Colonel Dowell and myself represent are concerned, we want to
ask additional questions of Agents Hirsh and Drayton.
The Attorney General. We will have them back on Monday. If you should change your mind before that,
you will let us know, I take it?
Colonel Royall. Yes. I
do not know whether the ruling of the Commission when it is made on the
question now before you will require the calling of any other agents or not;
but Colonel Dowell and myself are willing to take the risk of not calling any except those two, in either
event. We do not want to put these
agents to any inconvenience.
The Attorney General. We will agree to bring back anybody at any
time you wish, irrespective of any ruling, of course.
Colonel Royall. We think those two will be sufficient in
either event.
1815
The Attorney General. Colonel Ristine, are there some agents that
you wish to have return?
Colonel Ristine. Mr. Traynor.
Colonel Munson. And also Mr. McWhorter?
Colonel Ristine. We have an understanding that we will use a
memorandum which he prepared, in lieu of his testimony.
Colonel Royall. I assume that you are deferring until Monday
morning the hearing of argument?
The President. Yes.
The Attorney General. May Agent Donegan return to the court room on
Monday to have charge of exhibits again?
Colonel Royall. There is no objection to that at all.
The President. The Commission now adjourns until next Monday
morning at 10 o’clock.
(Whereupon, at 4:40 o’clock
p.m., an adjournment was taken until Monday, July 20, 1942, at 10 o’clock a.m.)